Men's Group

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)

6. Color me confused.

Mon Oct 15, 2012, 10:03 AM

Oct 2012

So what particular line of logic leads you to think that those who like PIV sex are just having lots of it because what-the-fuck-I-did-it-once-and-I-hate-it-so-I-might-as-well-do-it-shit-tons? Maybe they just like it? Why isn't that a possibility?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The penis as a terrorism device [View all] Major Nikon Oct 2012 OP

Holy shit she found us out! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #1

Well, I that guy Rinsed Penis is a terrorist in my book. I don't care how clean he keeps it. OffWithTheirHeads Oct 2012 #2

You mean Reese's Pubis? Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #4

I assume that capitalization and punctuation are also part of a paternalistic conspiracy. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #3

Capitalization supports the patriarchal dominance structure 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #7

+ a brazillion opiate69 Oct 2012 #8

They were still women back when I was in college. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #9

Clearly, an intervention is needed. opiate69 Oct 2012 #10

Too late! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #11

I thought it was just that the caps lock button at the library was broken. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #13

Ba-Zing! hifiguy Oct 2012 #29

Holy crap! HappyMe Oct 2012 #5

Color me confused. Goblinmonger Oct 2012 #6

They dont REALLY like it, they just think they do. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #12

It's like if you get a tooth pulled 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #14

The comments are hilarious/frightening 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #15

Not surprisingly, one of the usual suspects was quick to defend it Major Nikon Oct 2012 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #17

When they start ranting against the horrors of PIV sex 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #18

It's hard to consider the term "radfems" as a pejorative Major Nikon Oct 2012 #27

I've been getting word of a lot of 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #28

It is the Term They Used Macoy51 Oct 2012 #30

Can we cut to the chase and just call them assholes? A neutral... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #36

Ah but asshole is nonspecific 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #38

And of course, they banned you even though one of their members violated their own SOP first stevenleser Oct 2012 #19

I don't think it should be disbanded Major Nikon Oct 2012 #31

I think the group and its members have descended into a form of wingnuttery, ie outside the TOS stevenleser Oct 2012 #32

I think that shining some daylight into the issue helps. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #33

One thing to consider is they need pressure relief Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #39

Limiting the total number of users a forum may ban 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #35

Here's a good one: ("Seen On DU™") Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #20

Apparently saying one should be free to watch porn 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #21

They have definitely crossed the line into seperatist feminism with this anti-PIV stuff. stevenleser Oct 2012 #22

I have been told quite emphatically 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #23

Their view boils down to, the penis is evil, and people with penises who want sex are evil... stevenleser Oct 2012 #24

I especially like the bit 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #25

Yes, it's hard not to make obvious assumptions about who the target of this virulent diatribe is Major Nikon Oct 2012 #26

I tell you what Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #34

I read as much as I could of that mess, but what I really don't understand out of all of it... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #37

if you've ever been married you'd understand the impossible Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #40

I have had such girlfriends... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #41