Men's Group

Response to Upton (Reply #31)

Upton This message was self-deleted by its author.

Edit history

Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 OP

Darn. I was going to trademark The Patriarchy, but I see I was too late. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #1

i thought it was trademaked by the other side? tech_smythe Feb 2012 #2

Swinging by the "Feminists" forum mistertrickster Feb 2012 #3

In honor of the Feminists Group's, er, apparent altercation with the LGBT group, I think we should Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #8

you say that now... but wait till you've had my cookies tech_smythe Feb 2012 #12

Yup, it's true that both LGBT and women have been mistertrickster Feb 2012 #13

I think- as an unaffiliated observer- the 'fight' was stirred up; or escalated- deliberately Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #14

Is THAT where all this fur started flying? WhoIsNumberNone Feb 2012 #17

Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #19

I say, let's go for the Marxists! Since I'm a member of that group, mistertrickster Feb 2012 #20

There are third wavers who post there, me being one of them. Of course, 3rd wavers are generally stevenleser Feb 2012 #26

Oh, would that that fight could be so easily defined as all that. 9 Dimensional Rugby, is what it is Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #27

LOL, now THAT is a visual. 9 Dimensional Rugby. Wow! stevenleser Feb 2012 #28

forgive my ignorance... but what's a 3rd waver? tech_smythe Feb 2012 #29

My apologies, good question stevenleser Feb 2012 #30

So, in other words.. Upton Feb 2012 #31

That is one difference, yes, but there are several others. stevenleser Feb 2012 #32

Thanks.. Upton Feb 2012 #36

You're welcome. Well, tell us, which side do you support? nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Upton Feb 2012 #35

Thanks Steven, that was helpful. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2012 #34

Thank you, this was helpful!!! My head was spinning. Excellent definition. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2012 #38

I'll give you some insight into the thinking of a third waver. This one lady I knew who was big into stevenleser Feb 2012 #33

And if you do bring up the point of "privilege" as you stated.. MicaelS Jul 2012 #75

lmao Broderick Feb 2012 #4

Did Wienergate libodem Feb 2012 #5

All the cock talk was rather unnecessary when backed up with pictures Broderick Feb 2012 #6

That is pretty chicken libodem Feb 2012 #10

Beautiful Cock! aptal Feb 2012 #16

It made me so upset, I crashed my car. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #7

OMG libodem Feb 2012 #9

All I know is, Rick Santorum showed up and started yelling at my Garage about how it was "ungodly" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #11

What Patriarchy? Upton Feb 2012 #15

"Jesus! I was just looking for a quiet place to have a drink!" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #18

Oh yeah I remember that night. Rex Feb 2012 #40

Pardon my estrogen Matariki Feb 2012 #21

Pardon my estrogen, too... kdmorris Feb 2012 #22

Here's a dick with a smiley face. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #23

I see your confusion, but I was thinking more along the lines of a smiling penis Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #24

Or this. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #25

This place is funny like "Oh....ha!" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2012 #39

Purpose? Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #47

pearl clutching libodem Feb 2012 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #42

priggish libodem Feb 2012 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #44

You think that's bad.. Upton Feb 2012 #45

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #48

That must have been before men started thrusting (raping) during sex Major Nikon Jul 2012 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #50

I've actually read a couple of Dworkin's books Major Nikon Jul 2012 #51

I think some people never had any good sex Tsiyu Jul 2012 #52

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #53

Well, see, there is likewise no "Feminist Conspiracy" to discourage penetrative sex Tsiyu Jul 2012 #54

As to a feminist conspiracy against penetrative sex .. . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #55

I do not live in Sweden Tsiyu Jul 2012 #56

I don't live in pakistan 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #57

Not sure what your point is Tsiyu Jul 2012 #58

You claimed there was no feminist movement to ban penetrative sex 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #59

And don't forget, there are many people..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #60

When they start implementing them Tsiyu Jul 2012 #66

"If you only care about men's genitals, why just come out and say so." ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #67

Your comparisons and false equivalence are frightening Tsiyu Jul 2012 #61

More ad hominems 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #62

You don't get to call it ad hominem Tsiyu Jul 2012 #65

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #70

And again 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #71

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #69

This is the way I view what is being argued here Tsiyu Jul 2012 #72

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #73

In a women's forum dedicated to women's issues 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #74

He wasn't saying that at all.....just the opposite ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #63

good day n/t Tsiyu Jul 2012 #64

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #68

Charles Darwin would laugh himself into unconsciousness hifiguy Jul 2012 #76

Well....you know who hates Darwin and evolutionary biologists.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #77

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #78