Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

(4,717 posts)

4. Yes.

Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:48 PM

Sep 2012

Proof of non-existence is proof of existence anyway. Sounds like a drunken conversation about religion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How we judge the mistakes of male vs. female leaders [View all] 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 OP

There are many layers of fail in this article lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #1

You're only saying that because she's a woman! 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #2

Yes. ElboRuum Sep 2012 #4

Did they actually study anything? ElboRuum Sep 2012 #3

It was an interesting meta-study 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #5

Interesting... ElboRuum Oct 2012 #6

And I'm studying the response people have to the meta-meta-study 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #7

This "study" makes no sense. MadrasT Oct 2012 #8

I'm suspicious of many studies as well ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #9

Pseudo-science makes me cranky. MadrasT Oct 2012 #11

Critical thinking skills - you haz it opiate69 Oct 2012 #12