Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ElboRuum

(4,717 posts)
3. Did they actually study anything?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:42 PM
Sep 2012

Seems to me that the conclusion would have been the same or even moreso in affirming gender bias had a bias been exposed.

If this is the case, this suggests the following.

A study was created to study thing X. Aside from the flawed methodologies already mentioned in this thread, the "study" itself could have revealed either one of two outcomes. The first outcome would be A, and the second outcome would be B. Presumably, in such a study, outcome A would indicate something different in the conclusion than if the outcome was B. However, that is not what happened here. In this study, outcome A means the same thing as outcome B.

So in the end result, was anything really studied?

While I can accept that the study was poorly conceived, the fact that completely opposed findings could result in the same or similar conclusions very suspicious.

It usually indicates that the conclusion was forgone and was going to be supported either way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There are many layers of fail in this article lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #1
You're only saying that because she's a woman! 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #2
Yes. ElboRuum Sep 2012 #4
Did they actually study anything? ElboRuum Sep 2012 #3
It was an interesting meta-study 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #5
Interesting... ElboRuum Oct 2012 #6
And I'm studying the response people have to the meta-meta-study 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #7
This "study" makes no sense. MadrasT Oct 2012 #8
I'm suspicious of many studies as well ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #9
It makes it easy to tell true scientific disciplines from the pseudo-scientific frauds 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #10
Pseudo-science makes me cranky. MadrasT Oct 2012 #11
Critical thinking skills - you haz it opiate69 Oct 2012 #12
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»How we judge the mistakes...»Reply #3