Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

1. There is no rational reason why the law should treat this any differently than a similar

Reply to 4th law of robotics (Original post)

Thu Sep 27, 2012, 05:46 PM

Sep 2012

situation involving a non-working wife and a working husband.

If the state says marital assets are divided 50%, it doesn't- and shouldn't- matter which partner has the job or which one has the testicles.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"I'm Sick Of My Unemployed Husband" [View all] 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 OP

There is no rational reason why the law should treat this any differently than a similar Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #1

Presumably at some point gay marriage will become the law of the land 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #2

I think it varies from state to state. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #3

The law may be clear, but the interpretation of it isn't always 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #6

Custody and property aren't the same thing. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #8

wait till she sees how much alimony he wants. loli phabay Sep 2012 #4

Well he has become accustomed to a certain lifestyle 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #7

His wife sounds like a greedy POS Shitty Mitty Sep 2012 #5