Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: No Job? No Date for You! [View all]ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)40. Pretty interesting article...
This part, though I found very interesting.
What every mom wants is time with her kids, financial security and a sense of identity, says Morgan Steiner. When you feel like you dont have enough of any of those things and you see a woman who has made different choices than you, its easy to point fingers. Were all looking for having it all in our own lives and not finding it
And thats the moment when we start thinking its better on the other side of the fence.
Funny, that first sentence could have mom replaced with dad and be just as true.
I think the culture of "having it all" is the problem. We'd all like to have our cake and eat it too, but to aspire to that as an achievable goal and represent it in popular culture as an achievable goal is ludicrous. If one had infinite time and infinite control and infinite resources, sure, we could have it all, but we don't so we make choices and live with their consequence.
Put another way, life's hard... for everybody... except for those who read Forbes, apparently.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To the extent that "sex object" is a valid concept, it has a bookend: "success object". n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2012
#7
Even if you thought women exist solely as baby factories, it still wouldn't be "objectification"
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#16
lets be honest no one wants to date a loser, a one night stand might be okay but long term hell no
loli phabay
Sep 2012
#9
we are talking dating, not stay at home fathers. i am a HUGE supporter of stay at home
seabeyond
Sep 2012
#25
Well, there really is no double standard and I think that's what's at issue...
ElboRuum
Sep 2012
#29
"It's not a double standard, it's just plain old self-gratifying bullshit"
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#38
Only a fool would look for reason in a concept that is completely unreasonable
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#41
Well they seem to think they're just sooo much smarter than the average bear...
opiate69
Sep 2012
#34
Its the people who think "pro choice" means they get to be in charge of everyone ELSE'S choices
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2012
#55
Once upon a time, men decided how to protect the women. This is called patriarchy.
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2012
#57
because were entitled-y titled dooodley dooodz, silly! To be a dooooodly dood is to have a dastardly
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2012
#49