Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Workplace Salaries: At Last, Women on Top [View all]4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)57. I was never told I would have it easy without going to college
or even with for that matter.
I can't think of anyone who was told that.
There are plenty of boys who, by being pushed in to remedial classes or who face constant disciplinary issues, probably think that they're losers and don't stand a chance no matter what so why bother. But I don't think that's what you're talking about.
If you don't feel that you'll have to apply yourself very hard to achieve the outcome you desire in life, you won't be as motivated to work hard.
That's your theory. Now you must provide evidence to back it.
Your comparison to the days when women didn't do so well (in the workforce and in education) is a different scenario altogether. At that time, the basic role of women in society was to get married and to stay at home taking care of kids. Young women growing up in the roaring 20's weren't expected to go to college or obtain high powered careers at all. It's like comparing apples to oranges.
You just said men are told they don't need to go to college and they'll be just fine. So that's pretty much the same thing according to your assessment.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Once all relevant variables are accounted for men and women make the same
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#2
When you account for benefits, the wage gap pretty much disappears entirely
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#18
From a causality standpoint, I don't think the boys are the relevant audience.
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2012
#55
Ah but if you believe in the patriarchy conspiracy theory, the problem does exist
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#19
So why don't employers heavily favor women, if they can pay them less for the same work?
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#45
Calling something you don't agree with "right wing" is intellectual laziness
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#44
"the patriarchal system which existed 100 years ago allowed men more freedom than women"
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#48
No on has said that men being given more advantages 100 years ago was a rad-fem conspiracy theory
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#49
Wtf? It was just pointed out upthread that "the problem" most certainly does exist.
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#21
If "we" are providing women with gender based academic assistance, it should stop.
MadrasT
Sep 2012
#30
I said "if" because I don't really know what is out there, assistance-wise, for girls vs. boys.
MadrasT
Sep 2012
#35
you keep conflating issues and dragging in 'rad-fems', porn, rape whatever.
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#40