Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
1. This part I really don't get:
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 07:21 PM
Aug 2012
Later in the evening, conference attendees were addressed on a video link-up by Bush, who pledged to double federal funding for abstinence-only programs – $168 million is allocated for 2005 – and stated, "Through your educational programs, you reach out to countless young people to give them the support they need to make that responsible choice." Finally, Reisman was honored with an "Abstie Lifetime Achievement Award."


How can abstinence education cost that much?

Does it really cost 168 million to have each sex-ed teacher say "look, the best way not to get STDs or pregnant is not to have sex. If you can do that, great. If not . . . " and then move on to the real education.

It's like spending hundreds of millions on public health by simply telling them not to get sick. How? Where is that money going?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»more on anti-porn hero Ju...»Reply #1