Men's Group

mistertrickster

(7,062 posts)

3. Swinging by the "Feminists" forum

Reply to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Sun Feb 12, 2012, 09:59 PM

Feb 2012

is like going back 40 years.

Do these folks have no NEW IDEAS in four decades? It's all "pornography is bad, very very bad," (it objectivizes women, GASP!), "DUers blame women for their rapes as much as everybody else" (yet, oddly, there's no "Feminist group" over at FreeRepublic), "rapists are just normal men, doing what normal men do" . . . etc. etc.

I could never figure out how some poor SOB who was busting up concrete with a jackhammer is more "privileged" than freaking Paris Hilton, but by damn he IS just because he's part of "the patriarchy."

It's kinda like having the name Goldstein and being told you must be part of the world-wide Jewish control of banking and finance.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 OP

Darn. I was going to trademark The Patriarchy, but I see I was too late. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #1

i thought it was trademaked by the other side? tech_smythe Feb 2012 #2

Swinging by the "Feminists" forum mistertrickster Feb 2012 #3

In honor of the Feminists Group's, er, apparent altercation with the LGBT group, I think we should Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #8

you say that now... but wait till you've had my cookies tech_smythe Feb 2012 #12

Yup, it's true that both LGBT and women have been mistertrickster Feb 2012 #13

I think- as an unaffiliated observer- the 'fight' was stirred up; or escalated- deliberately Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #14

Is THAT where all this fur started flying? WhoIsNumberNone Feb 2012 #17

Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #19

I say, let's go for the Marxists! Since I'm a member of that group, mistertrickster Feb 2012 #20

There are third wavers who post there, me being one of them. Of course, 3rd wavers are generally stevenleser Feb 2012 #26

Oh, would that that fight could be so easily defined as all that. 9 Dimensional Rugby, is what it is Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #27

LOL, now THAT is a visual. 9 Dimensional Rugby. Wow! stevenleser Feb 2012 #28

forgive my ignorance... but what's a 3rd waver? tech_smythe Feb 2012 #29

My apologies, good question stevenleser Feb 2012 #30

So, in other words.. Upton Feb 2012 #31

That is one difference, yes, but there are several others. stevenleser Feb 2012 #32

Thanks.. Upton Feb 2012 #36

You're welcome. Well, tell us, which side do you support? nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Upton Feb 2012 #35

Thanks Steven, that was helpful. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2012 #34

Thank you, this was helpful!!! My head was spinning. Excellent definition. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2012 #38

I'll give you some insight into the thinking of a third waver. This one lady I knew who was big into stevenleser Feb 2012 #33

And if you do bring up the point of "privilege" as you stated.. MicaelS Jul 2012 #75

lmao Broderick Feb 2012 #4

Did Wienergate libodem Feb 2012 #5

All the cock talk was rather unnecessary when backed up with pictures Broderick Feb 2012 #6

That is pretty chicken libodem Feb 2012 #10

Beautiful Cock! aptal Feb 2012 #16

It made me so upset, I crashed my car. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #7

OMG libodem Feb 2012 #9

All I know is, Rick Santorum showed up and started yelling at my Garage about how it was "ungodly" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #11

What Patriarchy? Upton Feb 2012 #15

"Jesus! I was just looking for a quiet place to have a drink!" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #18

Oh yeah I remember that night. Rex Feb 2012 #40

Pardon my estrogen Matariki Feb 2012 #21

Pardon my estrogen, too... kdmorris Feb 2012 #22

Here's a dick with a smiley face. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #23

I see your confusion, but I was thinking more along the lines of a smiling penis Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #24

Or this. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #25

This place is funny like "Oh....ha!" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2012 #39

Purpose? Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #47

pearl clutching libodem Feb 2012 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #42

priggish libodem Feb 2012 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #44

You think that's bad.. Upton Feb 2012 #45

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #48

That must have been before men started thrusting (raping) during sex Major Nikon Jul 2012 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #50

I've actually read a couple of Dworkin's books Major Nikon Jul 2012 #51

I think some people never had any good sex Tsiyu Jul 2012 #52

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #53

Well, see, there is likewise no "Feminist Conspiracy" to discourage penetrative sex Tsiyu Jul 2012 #54

As to a feminist conspiracy against penetrative sex .. . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #55

I do not live in Sweden Tsiyu Jul 2012 #56

I don't live in pakistan 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #57

Not sure what your point is Tsiyu Jul 2012 #58

You claimed there was no feminist movement to ban penetrative sex 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #59

And don't forget, there are many people..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #60

When they start implementing them Tsiyu Jul 2012 #66

"If you only care about men's genitals, why just come out and say so." ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #67

Your comparisons and false equivalence are frightening Tsiyu Jul 2012 #61

More ad hominems 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #62

You don't get to call it ad hominem Tsiyu Jul 2012 #65

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #70

And again 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #71

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #69

This is the way I view what is being argued here Tsiyu Jul 2012 #72

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #73

In a women's forum dedicated to women's issues 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #74

He wasn't saying that at all.....just the opposite ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #63

good day n/t Tsiyu Jul 2012 #64

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #68

Charles Darwin would laugh himself into unconsciousness hifiguy Jul 2012 #76

Well....you know who hates Darwin and evolutionary biologists.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #77

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #78