Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:47 PM Feb 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]

This message was self-deleted by its author (Warren DeMontague) on Mon Apr 1, 2019, 04:04 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 OP
Darn. I was going to trademark The Patriarchy, but I see I was too late. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #1
i thought it was trademaked by the other side? tech_smythe Feb 2012 #2
Swinging by the "Feminists" forum mistertrickster Feb 2012 #3
In honor of the Feminists Group's, er, apparent altercation with the LGBT group, I think we should Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #8
you say that now... but wait till you've had my cookies tech_smythe Feb 2012 #12
Yup, it's true that both LGBT and women have been mistertrickster Feb 2012 #13
I think- as an unaffiliated observer- the 'fight' was stirred up; or escalated- deliberately Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #14
Is THAT where all this fur started flying? WhoIsNumberNone Feb 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #19
I say, let's go for the Marxists! Since I'm a member of that group, mistertrickster Feb 2012 #20
There are third wavers who post there, me being one of them. Of course, 3rd wavers are generally stevenleser Feb 2012 #26
Oh, would that that fight could be so easily defined as all that. 9 Dimensional Rugby, is what it is Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #27
LOL, now THAT is a visual. 9 Dimensional Rugby. Wow! stevenleser Feb 2012 #28
forgive my ignorance... but what's a 3rd waver? tech_smythe Feb 2012 #29
My apologies, good question stevenleser Feb 2012 #30
So, in other words.. Upton Feb 2012 #31
That is one difference, yes, but there are several others. stevenleser Feb 2012 #32
Thanks.. Upton Feb 2012 #36
You're welcome. Well, tell us, which side do you support? nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author Upton Feb 2012 #35
Thanks Steven, that was helpful. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2012 #34
Thank you, this was helpful!!! My head was spinning. Excellent definition. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2012 #38
I'll give you some insight into the thinking of a third waver. This one lady I knew who was big into stevenleser Feb 2012 #33
And if you do bring up the point of "privilege" as you stated.. MicaelS Jul 2012 #75
lmao Broderick Feb 2012 #4
Did Wienergate libodem Feb 2012 #5
All the cock talk was rather unnecessary when backed up with pictures Broderick Feb 2012 #6
That is pretty chicken libodem Feb 2012 #10
Beautiful Cock! aptal Feb 2012 #16
It made me so upset, I crashed my car. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #7
OMG libodem Feb 2012 #9
All I know is, Rick Santorum showed up and started yelling at my Garage about how it was "ungodly" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #11
What Patriarchy? Upton Feb 2012 #15
"Jesus! I was just looking for a quiet place to have a drink!" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #18
Oh yeah I remember that night. Rex Feb 2012 #40
Pardon my estrogen Matariki Feb 2012 #21
Pardon my estrogen, too... kdmorris Feb 2012 #22
Here's a dick with a smiley face. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #23
I see your confusion, but I was thinking more along the lines of a smiling penis Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #24
Or this. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #25
This place is funny like "Oh....ha!" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2012 #39
Purpose? Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #47
pearl clutching libodem Feb 2012 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #42
priggish libodem Feb 2012 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #44
You think that's bad.. Upton Feb 2012 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #48
That must have been before men started thrusting (raping) during sex Major Nikon Jul 2012 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #50
I've actually read a couple of Dworkin's books Major Nikon Jul 2012 #51
I think some people never had any good sex Tsiyu Jul 2012 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #53
Well, see, there is likewise no "Feminist Conspiracy" to discourage penetrative sex Tsiyu Jul 2012 #54
As to a feminist conspiracy against penetrative sex .. . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #55
I do not live in Sweden Tsiyu Jul 2012 #56
I don't live in pakistan 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #57
Not sure what your point is Tsiyu Jul 2012 #58
You claimed there was no feminist movement to ban penetrative sex 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #59
And don't forget, there are many people..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #60
When they start implementing them Tsiyu Jul 2012 #66
"If you only care about men's genitals, why just come out and say so." ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #67
Your comparisons and false equivalence are frightening Tsiyu Jul 2012 #61
More ad hominems 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #62
You don't get to call it ad hominem Tsiyu Jul 2012 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #70
And again 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #69
This is the way I view what is being argued here Tsiyu Jul 2012 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #73
In a women's forum dedicated to women's issues 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #74
He wasn't saying that at all.....just the opposite ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #63
good day n/t Tsiyu Jul 2012 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #68
Charles Darwin would laugh himself into unconsciousness hifiguy Jul 2012 #76
Well....you know who hates Darwin and evolutionary biologists.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #78
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»This message was self-del...»Reply #0