Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
6. Interesting post.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jul 2012

Since you've brought it into our group, I assume you want it looked at.

"hers was a criticism of the patriarchal view of sexual intercourse"


Okay, so, let's have a look at Dworkin's "criticism" of the same, shall we?

"Romantic love, in pornography as in life, is the mythic celebration of female negation. For a woman, love is defined as her willingness to submit to her own annihilation. The proof of love is that she is willing to be destroyed by the one whom she loves, for his sake. For the woman, love is always self-sacrifice, the sacrifice of identity, will, and bodily integrity, in order to fulfill and redeem the masculinity of her lover."

"Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women"

"For men I suspect that this transformation begins in the place they most dread -- that is, in a limp penis. I think that men will have to give up their precious erections and begin to make love as women do together."



Anyone want to come out of the woodwork to defend those specific quotes?

I'll wait.

More, from Scootaloo:

"Basically the whole idea that Dworkin was crazy"


Except, she WAS crazy. She hallucinated being pursued by giant invisible penises across Europe, in the years before she died. Even her most ardent supporters realized that she had finally come completely unglued, unlike her prior partial unglued-ness that caused her to say shit like penetrative intercourse is "immune to reform".


Scootaloo has obviously, deliberately and blatantly misrepresented the record on Andrea Dworkin.

I leave it to the reader to decide if Scootaloo is misrepresenting anything else.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I found that post pretty damn hard to believe. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #1
Well it is Meta, but it also a Men's issue. Bonobo Jul 2012 #2
I blame Nightmare Moon. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #3
FWIW MadrasT Jul 2012 #5
Interesting post. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #6
Actually MadrasT Jul 2012 #7
Ah. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #9
Scootaloo's credibility or lack thereof is not my job. MadrasT Jul 2012 #10
Off the subject, do you think the "brony" phenomenon is for real? Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #11
Maybe it is ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #15
I am completely supportive of any guy who wants to be one. Don't get me wrong. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #16
An old friend of mine, who happens to be a fine cartoonist, hifiguy Aug 2012 #17
Absolutely. And people like what they like, which is cool. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #19
I don't know. MadrasT Aug 2012 #18
Know what? Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #20
If you ever found the Powerpuff Girls entertaining hifiguy Aug 2012 #21
Very typical double standard. 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #4
OK since I stepped in to this sideways... MadrasT Jul 2012 #8
I believe they're not quite comparable. caseymoz Jul 2012 #12
Or, you can disagree with the point AND suggest there are probably better ways to communicate it. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #13
Well, then communication distracts from the point caseymoz Jul 2012 #14
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»A rather typical example ...»Reply #6