Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Poll: Would anyone here object to or be offended by skimpy outfits on male volleyball team members? [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)33. Your last statement, it would seem so, right?
I disagree. Money is merely thrilling when you spend it, but it's real power when you own enough of it. The way the 1 percent control this country, could you really say their cash is wasted potential? If they spend it all, they don't have that power
Not only that, but money has a law of gravitation. If you have enough, you could park it in bank accounts, diversify it, and pretty much live on the returns mere ownership of it brings. Compound interest alone lets you do that.
In today's environment, it can guarantee aristocracy for your offspring for centuries.
I'm probably not telling you anything you don't know, but what they mean for power is my point. I think people part with money far too easily, and in doing so, they've been giving a lot of power away to very few people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Poll: Would anyone here object to or be offended by skimpy outfits on male volleyball team members? [View all]
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2012
OP
Took a while, but here are my current (probably incoherent) thoughts on the subject.
rrneck
Aug 2012
#63
Really interesting post. It's gonna take me a while to sink my teeth into.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2012
#65
I think the complexity begins and ends with the opaque and subjective definition of "empowerment"
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2012
#10
"Empowering"? I think it's reasonable to inquire as to the nature of that power.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#11
Whether it's empowering or not I think is very much dependent on the person
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#40
Yes. Skimpy outfits without a purpose (like swimming/diving) have got to go.
applegrove
Jul 2012
#26
Sexy is fine in advertising. Or on the beach. I just think something overtly sexy, like a bikini on
applegrove
Jul 2012
#28
No. Neither the exposure of the male or female body is shameful. Depends how it is couched. In what
applegrove
Jul 2012
#30
In all seriousness, I agree that the primary function of a sport uniform should be utiltiarianism
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2012
#31
2012 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Cover. For RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY!
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2012
#36
That excuse is for people who have enough education to string a lot of words together.
lumberjack_jeff
Aug 2012
#45
I'm offended that he got to meet my favorite Olympians and I didn't. At least yet.
stevenleser
Aug 2012
#57
I can't very well say 'Yes' seeing as how I have posted videos of skimpy clothed men
stevenleser
Aug 2012
#56