This message was self-deleted by its author

[caseymoz]

1. Notice that they see her in underwear . . .

When she's clearly not in underwear? They also say she must be a tranny. This is similar to what goes on when the antis see a pornographic picture. They'll see terror in the pornstar's eyes. They'll say that there's someone holding a gun off screen, and so on. It's always biased toward making the image, or the circumstances where it was taken, worse.

That's why I think there's something else going on here besides simple ideological disagreement or principled objection. When the expressed perceptions radically differ from the image shown, always toward something more licentiousness, that's when I begin to question whether their midbrains aren't pulling some tricks on their unconscious. I begin to doubt whether they can even be rational about it, feminism or not.

I also think they're just another generation of censorious prudes with a different terminology. Same goals. Same justifications for the goals. Different vocabulary.