Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: If Misandry DOES exist, it might look like this: [View all]RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)34. It seemed to me that your point was what you stated in your post
which I linked to above, and wanted clarification if you were referring to both genders. Excerpt:
I've gone a few rounds with some of them, but the discussion is rarely very productive, no matter how civil I try to be. And they'll always complain about being unfairly characterized, but they're usually the first to throw out ridiculous strawmen which have little or no resemblance to reality.
In a perfect world of course a civil, reasonable approach is best. I've been on the receiving end of at least one personal attack that wasn't hidden (being called a dog for laughing at a joke made by a man) and have had posts hidden for being rude but they weren't toward anyone in the other group you frequent and were completely unrelated.
You don't owe me an explanation, however I thank you for it as I was curious if you were referring to both genders. From reading your response to me it I gathered your answer is "yes", but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong as I dislike it when people incorrectly infer something I wrote/said whether it's on a message board or in RL, so I wouldn't want to do it to others as I hate hypocrisy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is now another HoF thread declaring that short hair IS a political statement
Doctor_J
Jan 2014
#19
I'm sorry, I know this stuff upsets you but it just doesn't ping my radar at all.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#22
Would the person be accused of misogyny? Sure. Would the initial comment have been deserved?
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#24
"Men are swiftly accused of murderous misogynistic creepy disgusting rage and hatred." Okay, I can
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#26
No argument. I think we're closer on this issue than we both think sometimes.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#28
If the shoe fits, yes, absolutely. Rudeness and incivility are certainly not unique to either gender
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#30
I think you understand me just fine. And whatever disagreements I may have had with people
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#38
Ask women how they feel about their place in the world. Obviously you'll get a variety of answers
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#32
There's a difference between arguing that men have problems too - and they *do*, self-evidently -
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#41
Okay, maybe I'm judging them by the most extreme members. I should be a little more careful there.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#51
Which is also why it's not a good idea to judge feminists by their most extreme and vocal members
Major Nikon
Feb 2014
#53
Absolutely. I think Dworkin was a lunatic but that hardly motivates me to reject feminism generally.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#55
Y'know....there are people here who think calling Dworkin a lunatic....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Feb 2014
#57
If I were to rub in their faces how much I despise a (like it or not) significant feminist figure -
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#61
It is usually pushback from the widely accepted fact that Dworkin became a total kook
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Feb 2014
#66
As I'm sure you'd agree, privilege is a complex, nuanced thing. I never meant to argue otherwise.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#40
Then maybe we both just see what we want to see. If you don't think you're "privileged" then I guess
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#43
How exactly do sexual violence or lack of representation "prove female privilege"?
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#49
You're right, we can both cherry-pick stats all we want. But the most obvious conclusion is that
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#54
Whatever you call it, the important thing is admitting there's a problem.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#62
If there was one definition of the word, then it'd be possible to answer your question unequivocally
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#44
Okay, I don't like jokes insulting people's genitals, generally speaking. Male or female.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#63
"You want me to accept that a horny guy that tries to learn pickup techniques hates women?"
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#69
I just don't think an insulting blog post rates very high on the radar compared with, say, rape
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#73
That's not what I think. And I don't think many HOF members actually believe that either.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#75
I never said any of those things. Nor have I seen any posts saying so, at least not outright.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#77
OK, so what aspect of the PUA thing means they don't recognize the right to say no?
Bonobo
Feb 2014
#78
I say that the most persistent form of male privilege is the presumption that we have our own agency
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#82
Depends on the case, I suppose. If that exchange were between two people aready in a relationship
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#83
If privilege were subjective as some suggest, the entire concept would be worthless
Major Nikon
Feb 2014
#60
So you can objectively prove that women in America are "privileged" over men much the same way
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#64
Does the fact that blacks are incarcerated at a rate 6x whites reflect white privilege?
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#65
So you're convinced that women have (nearly) all the advantages, and men (nearly) all the
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#71
Yeah, I overstated things a bit. Didn't really mean to put words in your mouth or anything.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#84