Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: If Misandry DOES exist, it might look like this: [View all]Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)33. That's an argument against double standards, not for double standards
"fully equal" doesn't happen until both sides are treated the same.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is now another HoF thread declaring that short hair IS a political statement
Doctor_J
Jan 2014
#19
I'm sorry, I know this stuff upsets you but it just doesn't ping my radar at all.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#22
Would the person be accused of misogyny? Sure. Would the initial comment have been deserved?
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#24
"Men are swiftly accused of murderous misogynistic creepy disgusting rage and hatred." Okay, I can
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#26
No argument. I think we're closer on this issue than we both think sometimes.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#28
If the shoe fits, yes, absolutely. Rudeness and incivility are certainly not unique to either gender
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#30
I think you understand me just fine. And whatever disagreements I may have had with people
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#38
Ask women how they feel about their place in the world. Obviously you'll get a variety of answers
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#32
There's a difference between arguing that men have problems too - and they *do*, self-evidently -
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#41
Okay, maybe I'm judging them by the most extreme members. I should be a little more careful there.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#51
Which is also why it's not a good idea to judge feminists by their most extreme and vocal members
Major Nikon
Feb 2014
#53
Absolutely. I think Dworkin was a lunatic but that hardly motivates me to reject feminism generally.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#55
Y'know....there are people here who think calling Dworkin a lunatic....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Feb 2014
#57
If I were to rub in their faces how much I despise a (like it or not) significant feminist figure -
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#61
It is usually pushback from the widely accepted fact that Dworkin became a total kook
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Feb 2014
#66
As I'm sure you'd agree, privilege is a complex, nuanced thing. I never meant to argue otherwise.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#40
Then maybe we both just see what we want to see. If you don't think you're "privileged" then I guess
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#43
How exactly do sexual violence or lack of representation "prove female privilege"?
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#49
You're right, we can both cherry-pick stats all we want. But the most obvious conclusion is that
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#54
Whatever you call it, the important thing is admitting there's a problem.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#62
If there was one definition of the word, then it'd be possible to answer your question unequivocally
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#44
Okay, I don't like jokes insulting people's genitals, generally speaking. Male or female.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#63
"You want me to accept that a horny guy that tries to learn pickup techniques hates women?"
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#69
I just don't think an insulting blog post rates very high on the radar compared with, say, rape
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#73
That's not what I think. And I don't think many HOF members actually believe that either.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#75
I never said any of those things. Nor have I seen any posts saying so, at least not outright.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#77
OK, so what aspect of the PUA thing means they don't recognize the right to say no?
Bonobo
Feb 2014
#78
I say that the most persistent form of male privilege is the presumption that we have our own agency
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#82
Depends on the case, I suppose. If that exchange were between two people aready in a relationship
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#83
If privilege were subjective as some suggest, the entire concept would be worthless
Major Nikon
Feb 2014
#60
So you can objectively prove that women in America are "privileged" over men much the same way
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#64
Does the fact that blacks are incarcerated at a rate 6x whites reflect white privilege?
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#65
So you're convinced that women have (nearly) all the advantages, and men (nearly) all the
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#71
Yeah, I overstated things a bit. Didn't really mean to put words in your mouth or anything.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#84