Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Why don't science geeks have groupies, yet football players do? [View all]Upton
(9,709 posts)13. That's always a good idea..
and then there are sexual assault accusations, blackmail scams and more...A young relatively naive millionaire bursting with testosterone makes an awfully tempting target.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because science geeks generally don't make millions of dollars, so don't attract the kind of shallow
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#1
Neither is better or worse than the other, I would think. Shallow is shallow.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#10
No argument from me. I go by how people actually treat each other rather than some abstract notion
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#34
They certainly need to use protection, if nothing else. Thus avoiding most pregnancies/STD's.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#11
I fear that certain members of Congress happen to be among her biggest fans. n/t
radicalliberal
Jan 2014
#26
But if you are famous you will have groupies, no matter your vocation. Manson come to mind.
Exultant Democracy
Jan 2014
#23
Personally, I don't think groupies operate from an intellectual/rational basis.
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2014
#29