Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

In reply to the discussion: Found on Radfem website [View all]
Found on Radfem website [View all] Bonobo Dec 2013 OP
I remember back in the 70's radfems tried shitting on stay at home moms Major Nikon Dec 2013 #1
As I've maintained... opiate69 Dec 2013 #2
Reads like some sort of weird insider foreign language to me. nt rrneck Dec 2013 #3
It does not compute. TreasonousBastard Dec 2013 #4
The women shown in those photos Bonobo Dec 2013 #5
I wouldn't jump a fence to get into Lollapallooza Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #6
I once did security at the Newport Folk Festival ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #9
Speaking of Bob Dylan. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #10
Very little more sense... TreasonousBastard Dec 2013 #7
I think that's the point Major Nikon Dec 2013 #8
I know it's fun to laugh at the crazies, but what does any of this really prove? nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #11
For me, it raises a question. Bonobo Dec 2013 #12
I honestly don't know. Maybe they think those "other" feminists aren't feminist enough. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #13
Speaking of good feminist messages, here's one I saw today. Bonobo Dec 2013 #14
That is a good message RE: double standards. We're all human, we should all be treated (mostly) nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #15
As the object of their caricature-ization (?) lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #20
I agree that that kind of treatment is over-the-top and unfair. Especially when plenty of genuine nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #22
Hate is not laughable Major Nikon Dec 2013 #16
I certainly didn't mean to imply that those cited in the OP have anything to do with genuine social nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #17
Sounds a bit contradictory Major Nikon Dec 2013 #19
That is a valid point. I guess I just don't see cis-males as a socially disadvantaged group nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #23
So how would you quantify cis-females as a socially disadvantaged group? Major Nikon Dec 2013 #24
"Couldn't be more different"? How so? African-Americans (and others) have been historically nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #25
Race is generational, gender isn't Major Nikon Dec 2013 #26
We can measure racial disadvantage experienced by African or Native Americans in many ways. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #29
Far more likely to be sexually assaulted. More likely to be killed or seriously injured by domestic nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #31
Blacks experience more violent victimization than whites. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #32
So you actually think women are privileged over men in this society? Seriously? nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #33
Then you should be able to quantify your basis Major Nikon Dec 2013 #35
spluttering isn't an argument. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #36
I know it's not as simple as "all men are advantaged" and "all women are disadvantaged" nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #40
I'm seeing what I experience. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #43
Yeah, it's really not a safe (or fair) world for anyone. I'll agree with that much. n/t nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #44
"You have ample reasons" Inkfreak Dec 2013 #53
Why narrow the scope so substantially if you're not cherry picking? Major Nikon Dec 2013 #34
I guess the rebuttal would be that women are far more likely than men to be killed or nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #41
I would never claim that it isn't Major Nikon Dec 2013 #42
Things *have* changed, obviously. I just wish cultural attitudes didn't lag so far behind legal nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #45
You are still conflating gender discrimination with race discrimination Major Nikon Dec 2013 #49
Okay, maybe I exaggerated a bit. But they're certainly the loudest at least. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #51
There's also plenty of women who don't feel they have been discriminated against Major Nikon Dec 2013 #52
Again, any given experience is not necessarily universal. And yes, it *should* be about nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #54
I'm not even sure about "parity". lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #73
So you think that entirely (or at least mostly) accounts for the pay gap? Consider me skeptical... nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #75
It's not a matter of "think". It does. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #76
Interesting... I do think there's probably a good deal of truth to what you're saying. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #77
The status quo doesn't usually happen by conscious design. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #78
I think the way you just explained things is basically accurate, in a lot of respects. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #79
I agree strongly with your last sentence. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #50
It may be distinct, but it isn't the only one that matters. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #46
Like I said, cultural attitudes lagging behind legal realities. It's a significant problem no matter nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #48
The "radfems" at my university considered some of the most prominent feminists of the 20th Century Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2013 #37
"Jerking off", "jacking off", "getting your rocks off", etc. Bonobo Dec 2013 #38
Actually, if you can stomach it, I might recommend going to the source. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #47
I am considering it, thanks. nt Bonobo Dec 2013 #57
Near as I can tell... TreasonousBastard Dec 2013 #39
You mentioned something in another thread about labels lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #18
I basically agree. And I think the whole issue of who is or isn't a "real" feminist is hopelessly nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #21
You are 100% correct. For instance, I get accused of being "anti-Feminist" for criticizing Dworkin Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #27
I was imprecise. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #28
Okay. I think I'm clearer now. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #30
No transphobia? Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author Bonobo Dec 2013 #56
Let me clarify- I don't support reading things into people's words that they haven't explicitly said Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #58
True. Sometimes a cigar IS just a cigar Bonobo Dec 2013 #59
I don't think very many are going to come out and say it Major Nikon Dec 2013 #60
Sometimes it's not that hard to see. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #61
Is that the elephant in the room? Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #62
Nah, this is. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #63
Sorry, the gay just kicked up in me.... Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #64
Blame Banksy Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #65
Spank Banksy? Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #66
WE WOULD IF WE COULD FIND THAT NAUGHTY RASCAL! Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #67
Interesting to note; some people REALLY don't like it when certain aquatic fowl are mentioned Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #68
It must really make them quackers! Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #69
I know, I just don't appreciate Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #70
It ruffles my feathers too. Behind the Aegis Dec 2013 #71
Struck a nerve lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #72
The pushback going on is laughable ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #74
They pretend as if I am attacking Feminism and that is their biggest lie. Bonobo Dec 2013 #80
Well, there's a lot of protesting about smearing people they supposedly don't know or care about ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #81
The only one I know about got the boot sometime back Major Nikon Dec 2013 #82
The cusswords used are the ones we agree upon. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #83
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Found on Radfem website»Reply #69