Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Found on Radfem website [View all]Bonobo
(29,257 posts)14. Speaking of good feminist messages, here's one I saw today.
http://jezebel.com/this-commercial-totally-nails-the-double-standard-for-m-1478197103/
I would post to HOF, but I am banned there...which is another thing. I think they prop themselves up by creating "enemies" to be their foils -but in exchange they do their own cause a disservice by alienating people.
In truth, it would be, I think, better for their cause to be less obnoxious. Yeah, I know what they would say to that: That this is an attempt to silence them or that it reflects men wanting women to be docile or quiet or polite or something... but the fact is that everyone should be respectful, not just women.
We COULD all be allies instead of, as I said, creating the perception of an enemy in order to prop up their side.
Their methodology is essentially to say something so obnoxious that there is kickback and then to use that kickback to say "Aha! I told you so! See!?"
I would post to HOF, but I am banned there...which is another thing. I think they prop themselves up by creating "enemies" to be their foils -but in exchange they do their own cause a disservice by alienating people.
In truth, it would be, I think, better for their cause to be less obnoxious. Yeah, I know what they would say to that: That this is an attempt to silence them or that it reflects men wanting women to be docile or quiet or polite or something... but the fact is that everyone should be respectful, not just women.
We COULD all be allies instead of, as I said, creating the perception of an enemy in order to prop up their side.
Their methodology is essentially to say something so obnoxious that there is kickback and then to use that kickback to say "Aha! I told you so! See!?"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I know it's fun to laugh at the crazies, but what does any of this really prove?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#11
I honestly don't know. Maybe they think those "other" feminists aren't feminist enough.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#13
That is a good message RE: double standards. We're all human, we should all be treated (mostly)
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#15
I agree that that kind of treatment is over-the-top and unfair. Especially when plenty of genuine
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#22
I certainly didn't mean to imply that those cited in the OP have anything to do with genuine social
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#17
That is a valid point. I guess I just don't see cis-males as a socially disadvantaged group
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#23
"Couldn't be more different"? How so? African-Americans (and others) have been historically
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#25
We can measure racial disadvantage experienced by African or Native Americans in many ways.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#29
Far more likely to be sexually assaulted. More likely to be killed or seriously injured by domestic
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#31
So you actually think women are privileged over men in this society? Seriously?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#33
I know it's not as simple as "all men are advantaged" and "all women are disadvantaged"
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#40
Yeah, it's really not a safe (or fair) world for anyone. I'll agree with that much. n/t
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#44
I guess the rebuttal would be that women are far more likely than men to be killed or
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#41
Things *have* changed, obviously. I just wish cultural attitudes didn't lag so far behind legal
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#45
Okay, maybe I exaggerated a bit. But they're certainly the loudest at least.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#51
There's also plenty of women who don't feel they have been discriminated against
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#52
Again, any given experience is not necessarily universal. And yes, it *should* be about
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#54
So you think that entirely (or at least mostly) accounts for the pay gap? Consider me skeptical...
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#75
Interesting... I do think there's probably a good deal of truth to what you're saying.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#77
I think the way you just explained things is basically accurate, in a lot of respects.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#79
Like I said, cultural attitudes lagging behind legal realities. It's a significant problem no matter
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#48
The "radfems" at my university considered some of the most prominent feminists of the 20th Century
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Dec 2013
#37
I basically agree. And I think the whole issue of who is or isn't a "real" feminist is hopelessly
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#21
You are 100% correct. For instance, I get accused of being "anti-Feminist" for criticizing Dworkin
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#27
Let me clarify- I don't support reading things into people's words that they haven't explicitly said
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#58
Interesting to note; some people REALLY don't like it when certain aquatic fowl are mentioned
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#68
Well, there's a lot of protesting about smearing people they supposedly don't know or care about
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2013
#81