Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
Showing Original Post only (View all)Yes, Patriarchy Is Dead; the Feminists Prove It [View all]
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/09/23/yes_patriarchy_is_dead_the_feminists_prove_it_120031.htmlYes, Patriarchy Is Dead; the Feminists Prove It
By Cathy Young - September 23, 2013
When writer Hanna Rosin recently published an article on Slate.com stating that the patriarchy is dead, much of the feminist response amounted to burn the heretic! New Republic editor and blogger Nora Caplan-Bricker accused Rosin of mansplaining -- the femospheres pejorative term for supposedly obtuse and arrogant male arguments on gender, apparently now also applied to female dissent -- and being the patriarchys unwitting tool. San Jose State University philosophy professor Janet Stemwedel tweeted her gloating over Rosins Wikipedia page being vandalized to read, for a brief time, Hanna Rosin (born 1970) is a terrible human being.
Ironically, the feminist tendency to shoot the bringer of good news was the very topic of Rosins essay, adapted from the new epilogue to the paperback edition of her book The End of Men -- which, despite its title, is more about female ascendance than male decline. Rosin noted with bemusement that rebuttals to her report on womens rising fortunes were greeted with palpable relief -- not by male chauvinists but by feminists. (It isnt just Rosin: When a recent study demonstrated that female political candidates are not judged more negatively than male ones, not even for their looks and dress, feminists reacted with either silence or sniping.)
So where is this dreaded American patriarchy Rosin is covering up? Some critiques of her argument boil down to its only affluent white women who are doing well (and poor minority men are presumably basking in privilege). A gentleman critic, fellow Slate.com author Matthew Yglesias, cites mens numerical dominance in corporate America -- as if Rosin might be unaware of these statistics. (One figure he omits: Women control 60 percent of the wealth in the United States.) But mostly, Rosins detractors focus on womens abuse by men and on pervasive cultural biases against women, from beauty pressures to so-called slut-shaming. Patriarchy, says Caplan-Bricker, is living in a society where both women and men save their harshest judgment for women.
In its present form -- as a secular cult that should call itself the Sisters of Perpetual Grievance -- feminism is far more a part of the problem than part of the solution. It clings to womens wrongs and turns womens rights into narcissistic entitlement. It is far too easily prone to bashing men while painting women as insultingly helpless and downplaying their human capacity for cruelty. (The notion that abuse and dominance would not exist without patriarchy is not only naively utopian but utterly sexist.) It is also deeply irrelevant to most women, only 5 percent of whom consider themselves strong feminists, even though 82 percent believe that men and women should be social, political, and economic equals.
Of course the patriarchy -- at least here in the West -- is dead. Whether feminism deserves to survive it is up to the feminists.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
56 replies, 12433 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But in that case they're "protected" at the expense of any possible freedom or self-determination.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#22
No argument. "Freedom" is always relative - in many cases very, VERY relative. n/t
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#24
When women were underrepresented in college is was most certainly a crisis.
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2014
#44
The demographic trend of an increasing percentage of young people going to college...
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2014
#55
The need for victimization intervention for men is irrelevant. Political will is nonexistent.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#34
I just don't see where she's coming from at all. Seems an incredibly selective view of things.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#12