Political parties are important part of the system and rigging a system to favor non-affiliated persons makes no sense and would never be adopted in the real world. The California top two system sort of ignores political parties by allowing the top two candidates to advance to the general election but this does not really matter since California has largely become a Blue state. Many elections involve two Democratic party members running against each other.
The Alaska top four system with rank choice voting is interesting. The defeat of Sarah Palin amused me and Palin is worried about the general election.
Political parties are part of the system, and these parties are NOT going to go away. Your concept "of the initial computerized selection system according to correspondence of the candidates' views with the outcome of the surveys" makes no sense to me and there are too many games. Let the voters decide and attempts to lessen the influence of political parties make no sense to me
Again, in Texas county and municipal elections used to be non-partisan. That has changed and now in Harris County we have a TFG supporter backed by a ton of GOP donor money going after Lina Hidalgo. These non-partisan races are now very partisan.
I have been involved in the Democratic Party in Texas for a very long time. We are making progress and I have training next week for voter protection efforts. I do not believe in getting rid of or lessening the influence of political parties.
Have fun