Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democracy for America

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Huin

(92 posts)
Tue Sep 27, 2022, 11:22 AM Sep 2022

An Idea to encourage compromise in the U.S. House of Representatives [View all]

It may be a goofy idea and not at all realistic.
But please don't throw it out by a cutting response, but please respond with positive criticism.
Let's have a thread of discussion to develop this idea. Raise objections to it and I shall answer them if I can or admit defeat.
But please consider and respond to my answers.
The idea is to realign the number of voting deligates in the U.S. House of Representatives which are elected each State. One-third of each voting seats may not be filled by party-associated candidates. Those one-third of seats for each state shall be filled by non-party affiliated candidates elected state-wide like a senator based on each candidtate's personal platform of preference of political issues. In a State with more than three seats up for election, each voter in each District votes for one party-affiliated candidate of their choice and for all other non-affiliated candidates of the State. I realize that a State with less than three seats in the House needs to be handled differently. But that we can develop in this game if we find members to play it by responding.
So this is my basic proposal in a nutshell. Anybody willing to play the game?

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm afraid that these days unaffiliated means republican Walleye Sep 2022 #1
For unaffilieated we need to develop how the candidates are picked Huin Sep 2022 #4
How would requiring 1/3rd of the House reps per state be "free agents" encourage compromise FreepFryer Sep 2022 #2
These candidates when elected have a mandate to those who elected them Huin Sep 2022 #5
so a survey company will set the political agenda ? FreepFryer Sep 2022 #8
Destroying the two party system is not a way to fix anything LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #3
Who is talking about destroying a two-party system? Huin Sep 2022 #6
Are you kidding? The premise of your plan is to destroy the two party system LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #7
I need to disagree. I do not want to destroy but strengthen our two party system. Huin Sep 2022 #12
I am amused that you do not understand the concepts LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #15
BTW, your silly plan would kill the Congressional Black Caucus LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #9
The "Why" of this should be explained Huin Sep 2022 #10
Your plan would eliminate minority majority congressional districts LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #11
But not the ability to run for the same seat without affiliation. Huin Sep 2022 #13
Which would never work in the real world LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #14
So we part and go our ways Huin Sep 2022 #16
You have clearly not interacted with many lawyers. LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #17
Thank you for your reply Huin Oct 2022 #18
Your hatred of political parties doomed your concept LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2022 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democracy for America»An Idea to encourage comp...»Reply #0