Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
9. unhappycamper
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 09:09 AM
Sep 2014

unhappycamper

I think high ranking officers in the armed forces - should be conserding doing their job - not playing politic - if they want to play politic - then leave the rank of officers - and be a full time politic an - not blend both ways - I guess it is a long time since Truman stated that the only colour he cared for in the armed forces was the olive green brand - when he de-segregated the armed forces in the 1950s - because it was the logic way of doing it - and many men of color had serving their country with distention and honor....

People who want to start dissent inside the rank of the armed forces - should be very careful - as the way from dissent - to a trial for sedition or treason is a very short one - and I suspect mr Lamborn from Colorado have overstepped it boundaries - when he want generals to quit their service because they do not like the president who are in sharge....

If I was Obama - I would do as Kennedy did when generals was rebelling his rule in early 1960s - specially under the Cuba crisis - he accepted their resignations from duty and more or less fired them on the spot - repleasing them with others who was less troublesome - and who might not as Gun-ho as some was... That cooled their head somehow - that the US president fired some Generals on the spot..

Im not sure how things work in US when it come to generals medling in the sivilian government - but in Norway - the officers are 100 percent under control of the sivilian government - and have no political control at all.. It all goes back to the years between the wars (ww1 and ww2) where the officers indeed had some political clout - and also was afraid of the labour movement - who was going from strengt to strengt in the 1920s - and who in 1933 - was elected into office - from then to 1940 - the officers was troublesome - and problematic - and have no love for the labour party at all - in fact many was more afraid of their soldiers than against the germans who in 1940 attaced norway - and keept it for 5 years - after ww2 - all branches of the armed forces was re-constructed - and put under strict sivilian rule - and have been that since....

It is maybe time for the current US administration to do the same to the armed forces in the US - put the control where it belong - under sivilian rule... And put the generals in their place..

Diclotican

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicking riqster Sep 2014 #1
This man should be expelled from Congress. Faryn Balyncd Sep 2014 #2
Inciting Rebellion is Treason. PeoViejo Sep 2014 #3
No treason is working for a foreign power. This is Sedition. Katashi_itto Sep 2014 #4
What about those words in their oath... ReRe Sep 2014 #5
Its still Sedition. Regardless. Which carries a heavy penalty anyway Katashi_itto Sep 2014 #24
This is treason and this man should be PatrickforO Sep 2014 #6
Wrong order, IMO ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #12
I like Patrick's order better jmowreader Sep 2014 #29
There's that small Due Process issue. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #30
You can be suspended from a public job before the hearing jmowreader Sep 2014 #31
And it's still Sedition. Not Treason. Katashi_itto Sep 2014 #25
He's the one who used 'tar baby' about BO and also refused to attend SOTU 2012. Fuck him. CurtEastPoint Sep 2014 #7
Perhaps they should be forced to watch "7 Days in May". Traitorous bastards. catbyte Sep 2014 #8
unhappycamper Diclotican Sep 2014 #9
While on active duty. US Generals should stay out of politics and avoid affairs. unhappycamper Sep 2014 #23
Diclotican-- Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #34
Sedition. toby jo Sep 2014 #10
He took an oath to uphold the Constitution Sanity Claws Sep 2014 #11
Second Amendment? SwankyXomb Sep 2014 #14
Get Fox News to put a (D) behind his name when they put his picture on the teevee jmowreader Sep 2014 #18
"50 tea party supporters in a bar basement" louis-t Sep 2014 #13
Use the Patriot Act on these seditionists. muntrv Sep 2014 #15
+1 navarth Sep 2014 #17
Arrest his ass and let it play out in court world wide wally Sep 2014 #16
Is this kind of treason The Wizard Sep 2014 #19
Yup, ole Dougie El Shaman Sep 2014 #20
Does the FBI keep an eye on this crowd, say like they did the Black Panthers? YOHABLO Sep 2014 #21
the last thing in the world these fucks care about barbtries Sep 2014 #22
While I agree that this comes pretty close to sedition Stonepounder Sep 2014 #26
The proof would have to be very solid. Video and audio of him fomenting rebellion would have to alfredo Sep 2014 #28
So this took place in a Bar? Hmmm, sounds like the beer hall putsch. alfredo Sep 2014 #27
Ring! Ring! Calling Smedley Butler. Hello? Hello? 99th_Monkey Sep 2014 #32
Doug Lamborn, warmongering republican douche, sulphurdunn Sep 2014 #33
Greatest Threat Larry66 Oct 2014 #35
Just like Tokyo Rose. EC Oct 2014 #36
Good mwrguy Oct 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»Seditious Republicans Spe...»Reply #9