Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
26. You raise a number of very valid points.
Thu May 7, 2015, 06:35 PM
May 2015

First point: I agree that Bush Jr. is one of the dim sons in the clan. (But I love dim sum)

I would argue that NAFTA, and the GATT, were designed to do what they did. They allowed for the free movement of capital and manufactured goods no matter the cost to US workers. And the fact that, as you point out, we cannot trust many from both parties to protect the workers, indicates to me that all of these trade agreements are benefitting the wealthy.

On your point about becoming rich, no argument. But too many billionaires became rich by underpaying their workers and avoiding and evading taxes. McDonalds Corporation, Wal-Mart, Bill Gates, and many others used this particular business model. That it is "legal" under US tax law merely points out how the rich buy politicians and the bought politicians make law.

As to Clinton, there have been stories about the Clinton Foundation in Haiti that point to Clinton exploiting the country to make money. Specifically, the free trade zones that Clinton was working on that basically rely on Haitian slave labor as a business model.

See the following link for some info. And there is more out there:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/mary-ogrady-bill-clinton-spins-his-haiti-intervention-1411339321

and also:
http://www.coha.org/haiti-research-file-neoliberalism%E2%80%99s-heavy-hand-on-haiti%E2%80%99s-vulnerable-agricultural-economy-the-american-rice-scandal/

and very eye-opening:
http://www.ezilidanto.com/zili/2015/03/clintonminingthieveryinhaiti/

read and see what you think about Clinton.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bravo! leftofcool May 2015 #1
Hi, leftofcool. sheshe2 May 2015 #4
You are so right! leftofcool May 2015 #5
Thanks for the post sheshe! guillaumeb May 2015 #2
He will, guillaumeb! sheshe2 May 2015 #3
Not sure why you would conflate Clinton with BlueMTexpat May 2015 #18
Not sure where I did this? sheshe2 May 2015 #21
I don't think that I was responding to your post BlueMTexpat May 2015 #22
That's okay, thank you. sheshe2 May 2015 #24
William Clinton, in my opinion, guillaumeb May 2015 #23
I agree with you that there was a lot of BlueMTexpat May 2015 #25
You raise a number of very valid points. guillaumeb May 2015 #26
Thanks for posting links! :) BlueMTexpat May 2015 #27
Obama unleashed! yallerdawg May 2015 #6
"Obama unleashed!" sheshe2 May 2015 #8
He will not be riding off into the sunset, brer cat May 2015 #7
You are so very correct, brer cat! sheshe2 May 2015 #10
it will be fascinating drray23 May 2015 #9
Oh yes mainstreetonce May 2015 #11
Ya know what? fadedrose May 2015 #12
Yes! Best person for it and Holder as well. sheshe2 May 2015 #13
So glad he is taking on this role! Go Bama ~ BUT NOT YET! We need you! n/t freshwest May 2015 #14
We have him for awhile yet. sheshe2 May 2015 #15
Agree~but not yet, we need you. sheshe2 May 2015 #17
He is the ideal person to lead on that treestar May 2015 #16
He is so perfect for this! nt steve2470 May 2015 #19
Great news! BumRushDaShow May 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»Obama Says He'll Continue...»Reply #26