Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,502 posts)
25. I agree with you that there was a lot of
Thu May 7, 2015, 03:50 AM
May 2015

wasted potential with Bill Clinton's Presidency - too much DLC influence, kowtowing to the RW & self-indulgence with relationships. But frankly NAFTA, if managed, implemented and enforced properly by his successor, could have been much less of a disaster than it has been for both the US and Mexico.

Unfortunately, his successor-in-fact was Cheney rather than Bush II (although feckless dim son was no better than Cheney, if not as consciously and deliberately evil perhaps) and eight years of disastrous GOP economic policies exacerbated all of NAFTA's many flaws. This is just one of many reasons why abominations such as the TPP in its current form should not pass - we cannot trust who will be around to implement provisions. If it is any GOPer, it will be an unmitigated disaster for all but the One Percent - nothing less.

As for Clinton's becoming rich after his Presidency, there is certainly nothing wrong per se in that. In fact, there is nothing wrong in anyone's becoming rich, if their wealth is obtained honestly rather than by exploiting the vulnerable. And when those who are wealthy recognize that they have responsibilities towards the vulnerable and use their wealth and influence to help those who are vulnerable become less so in any way, then I certainly applaud that. They SHOULD do that. They should also realize, however, that private sector charity is simply not enough - that government policies should also be geared towards improving the lot of the vulnerable and disadvantaged. I believe that Clinton and others do realize that.

I believe that we agree about a lot more than we disagree about. But I do challenge you to explain to me exactly how Bill Clinton's becoming wealthy after his Presidency exploited anyone vulnerable. And I also return to my first comment: considering what he has done with that wealth, how can you honestly conflate him with Reagan in any way at all?



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bravo! leftofcool May 2015 #1
Hi, leftofcool. sheshe2 May 2015 #4
You are so right! leftofcool May 2015 #5
Thanks for the post sheshe! guillaumeb May 2015 #2
He will, guillaumeb! sheshe2 May 2015 #3
Not sure why you would conflate Clinton with BlueMTexpat May 2015 #18
Not sure where I did this? sheshe2 May 2015 #21
I don't think that I was responding to your post BlueMTexpat May 2015 #22
That's okay, thank you. sheshe2 May 2015 #24
William Clinton, in my opinion, guillaumeb May 2015 #23
I agree with you that there was a lot of BlueMTexpat May 2015 #25
You raise a number of very valid points. guillaumeb May 2015 #26
Thanks for posting links! :) BlueMTexpat May 2015 #27
Obama unleashed! yallerdawg May 2015 #6
"Obama unleashed!" sheshe2 May 2015 #8
He will not be riding off into the sunset, brer cat May 2015 #7
You are so very correct, brer cat! sheshe2 May 2015 #10
it will be fascinating drray23 May 2015 #9
Oh yes mainstreetonce May 2015 #11
Ya know what? fadedrose May 2015 #12
Yes! Best person for it and Holder as well. sheshe2 May 2015 #13
So glad he is taking on this role! Go Bama ~ BUT NOT YET! We need you! n/t freshwest May 2015 #14
We have him for awhile yet. sheshe2 May 2015 #15
Agree~but not yet, we need you. sheshe2 May 2015 #17
He is the ideal person to lead on that treestar May 2015 #16
He is so perfect for this! nt steve2470 May 2015 #19
Great news! BumRushDaShow May 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»Obama Says He'll Continue...»Reply #25