Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
24. Also look at the "Carville Effect"
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 04:05 PM
Apr 2012

I have posted this many times on DU - it is the morning after the Nov 2004 Presidential election.

James Carville is whispering into John Kerry's ear, that in regards to Ohio, Kerry should concede. Kerry is misinformed: he is told that there are only 250,000 ballots in dispute that could possibly be counted to overthrow Bush's 138,000 ballot lead.

What those of us who hate Carville for this know are the following salient points:
One) there were other matters above and beyond the 250,000 ballots.
Those matters include the suppression of the vote by not allowing enough election machines into heavily Democratic areas, while keeping the Republican districts supplied with surplus of machinery.
The outright flipping of votes: see the most excellent film "Stealing America- vote by vote", by Dorothy Faddiman
The wrongful tallying of votes - as when several dozen districts had more Bush voters than actual registered voters

Two) The lock down inside Warren County's vote counting headquarters, by official Young of the local Emergency Services. Young was claiming that Homeland Security said that there was a threat. After Kerry's concession, it came out that Homeland Security had not ruled that there was a terrorist threat. Nor had the FBI CIA or any other security agency. Kerry should not have conceded at least until charges were levied against Mr. Young. Other wise it sets the stage for any voting official who desires that the vote be counted in secret use this action as a precedent.

(Currently, as the National Election guidelines and state guidelines are written, any person(s) who wish to watch the vote count at their local Registrar of Voters office may do so, simply by letting the local ROV know of their intention ahead of time. Failure of the ROV to comply carries legal penalties. Contact yr local County District Attorney if you are denied this right.
Three) Voting activists in Ohio now believe that at the time that Kerry conceded - there were about 400,000 ballots that could have entered into a contested election scenario. Those 400,000 ballots would be more than enough ballots to defeat Bush's lead, especially considering that many of these were provisional ballots - and provisionals are usually from poorer minority voters.

The fact that Kerry conceded sets up an incredibly painful precedent. It shows us that whenever an election is won by illegal means, there is no point in fighting to establish the wrongfulness of said election: after all, Kerry "did the right thing for the country while we were at war."

The fact that Carville was acting, perhaps as much on Clinton's behalf as his own behalf, to secure for her the chance to run in 2008, indicates to me that Clinton is not out for this country but for her own self interests.


Here is a portion of an article which can be read in entirety at

http://tinyurl.com/yrfaqo


Did Carville and Joe Lockhart Sell Kerry Out?



Woodward's book lays it out pretty plainly. No one should be surprised.

One important point, however, is that people have started talking about the Carville - Matalin angle, but everyone stops there. If you read a bit further Mike McCurry comes into the picture. It seals the deal.

Here's a story not in the Woodward book. According to one person I talked to today, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Joe Lockhart, in the middle of a heated presidential campaign, started making new business calls out of the Kerry war room giving out confidential campaign information while he was at it. Obviously trying to hedge his bets, he'd call out, give poll data and other info to people, while trying to drum up business for himself. Class act.

Frankly, it reminds me of what McCurry did on the Net Neutrality stuff.

For DC Democrats it's all about keeping your candidates close, but your business associates and their interests closer.

As for what's said in the Woodward book, one Kerry camp insider I talked to today certainly wasn't surprised by the revelations.


"The fact that the Clintonistas did not truly have JK's best interest at heart in 2004 comes as no surprise to anyone deeply involved in the Kerry camp." - Kerry insider, who would not go on the record.

At some point it got out of control.

The DC Dems hired to fight for John Kerry simply sold him out at the first sign of a fight. Except for a loyal group closest to Kerry, many of the people in his employ simply sucked. I can't say it any plainer. Woodward offers more proof on what's been speculated about for a couple of years now.

But did Carville and McCurry really sell Kerry out? Playing stenographer, because this is important, I offer the whole picture, which goes way beyond Carville. It points to the reality that if our presidential candidate is going to win he or she has to extricate themselves from these self-interested traitors inside our own party who are willing to sell out the Democratic Party cause, which must be to fight and win elections, in support of their own interests.

It's important to hammer this scene out because we are facing a critical election in just a few weeks. Every single candidate must be prepared to stand up and fight back, because it takes more than just counting the vote against Republicans these days. As an aside, if you can vote through absentee ballot, which offers a paper trail that electronic voting does not, do it.

But when the end isn't certain there is only one thing to do: declare victory and fight it out.

It's clear Carville and McCurry had their eyes on something else entirely. With Democrats like Carville and McCurry helping us out on election night we hardly need Karl Rove.


After 1 a.m., Card called Cahill.

Cahill said the Kerry campaign felt confident.

Card was caught off guard. ... --Is there going to be a phone call?"

"We won't be calling you," Cahill replied. She seemed to be half asking whether Bush would be calling Kerry to concede.

(snip)

Matalin is married to James Carville, a Democrat who had been chief political strategist for Bill Clinton in 1992. ... ...

"Look, I know this is hard for you," she told him sympathetically.
Did Carville and Joe Lockhart, and McCurry Sell Kerry Out?



<end of snip>

If you are really interested in this issue go over to the Brad blog.com.... He does alot of stuff southernyankeebelle Mar 2012 #1
here's a good start blm Mar 2012 #2
Facts Botany Mar 2012 #3
Thank you. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #4
big dots Botany Mar 2012 #5
I understand... The Doctor. Mar 2012 #6
People can have different opinions but you can only have one set of facts Botany Mar 2012 #7
Such proof is not hard to explain. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #8
You don't have to convince him that it happened. You only have to convince him that it's possible.. Scuba Mar 2012 #9
+ Every one of those millions of Americans who understand the issue truedelphi Apr 2012 #22
I can lead a wingnut to info but I cannot make him think. Botany Mar 2012 #11
Thank you for this excellent summary / recap of these event.... Scuba Mar 2012 #10
Can you please provide a link for those? The Doctor. Mar 2012 #14
So the salon.com article kctim Mar 2012 #12
No, it's called a 'starting point'. I have trouble believing that you 'did the research'. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #13
Ah, a 'starting point' kctim Mar 2012 #15
Yes, a starting point. The Doctor. Apr 2012 #18
It is not only MY conclusion kctim Apr 2012 #25
How typical. All you have is derision to fall back on. The Doctor. Apr 2012 #26
Those in control of the Democratic Party at the highest levels are truedelphi Apr 2012 #27
Also, a question: The Doctor. Apr 2012 #29
What proof do you want? Sancho Apr 2012 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author The Doctor. Apr 2012 #17
You know kctim you keep talking and talking. I really suggest you take the time to go over southernyankeebelle Apr 2012 #28
Read "Witness to a Crime" by Richard Hayes Phillips. truckin Apr 2012 #16
You might thoroughly read the following article: truedelphi Apr 2012 #20
You might also read this article as well: truedelphi Apr 2012 #21
You might also consider purchasing the excellent video truedelphi Apr 2012 #23
Also look at the "Carville Effect" truedelphi Apr 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»So, What Are the Facts th...»Reply #24