Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

North Dakota

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)

6. From a cursory reading of that, I could see that the pipeline builders failed to adjust the route

Reply to Travis_0004 (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 07:38 PM

Dec 2016

to avoid desecrating the burial ground, and seemed to have pushed ahead on going through the burial grounds while an injunction against further construction was in place.

And they may have consulted with the tribes...but is there any evidence that they actually changed anything in response to what the tribes said during the consultations?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How many jobs do DA supporters think the pipeline would create in North Dakota? [View all] Ken Burch Dec 2016 OP

Choice between bad and worse HassleCat Dec 2016 #1

It's extortion rather than promises. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #2

You have to transport it someway Travis_0004 Dec 2016 #3

My question is, why couldn't they at least have routed the line Ken Burch Dec 2016 #4

They consulted with different tribes over 250 times Travis_0004 Dec 2016 #5

From a cursory reading of that, I could see that the pipeline builders failed to adjust the route Ken Burch Dec 2016 #6

I can't speak to the propaganda Qanisqineq Dec 2016 #7