Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thucythucy

(8,830 posts)
7. The only people I can think of that are at all consistent about this
Wed Oct 13, 2021, 06:23 AM
Oct 2021

are Christian Scientists, who oppose pretty much all medical interventions (and I take it this means they won't be going into any ER or ICU when the virus hits them).

The Pope has come out and said Catholics should get the vaccine.

I would think that fundamentalist Protestants and others who oppose vaccination should face the same scrutiny as draftees who want to claim conscientious objector status.

In fact it should be heightened, since draftees can make their claims under the first amendment, since it clearly covers government entities such as draft boards. I would imagine that arguing for such exemptions from a private entity would face a higher burden of proof--since their claims are in direct opposition to the rights of business owners to keep their work places safe for others.

Just my opinion--I'm certainly not an attorney or any kind of constitutional scholar.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New York»New York must allow relig...»Reply #7