Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massachusetts

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)

8. Trump got 32% of the MA vote in '16. I doubt those sorts of people would be sympathetic

Reply to smirkymonkey (Reply #7)

Tue Jul 9, 2019, 08:08 PM

Jul 2019

What's more likely is many people would simply outmigrate, thus moving the center of power west to the
Worcester and Connecticut Valley areas- (relatively) cheap land prices alone would drive a lot of that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think Massachusetts might very well split up over the effects of rising sea levels [View all] friendly_iconoclast Jun 2019 OP

Maybe we should move people out of those areas and let nature have them . Autumn Jun 2019 #1

I agree- but this is Massachusetts, where money flows towards Boston friendly_iconoclast Jun 2019 #2

Why would Republicans need to protect their homes from rising sea levels? TheRealNorth Jun 2019 #3

This is cultural. Central and W. Mass have *always* been treated like unwanted stepchildren friendly_iconoclast Jun 2019 #4

Let me put in another way. Why do people in western and central MA smirkymonkey Jul 2019 #5

Central and Western Mass will not want to pay for protecting the Atlantic Coast friendly_iconoclast Jul 2019 #6

That is where a majority of the tax revenue comes from. smirkymonkey Jul 2019 #7

Trump got 32% of the MA vote in '16. I doubt those sorts of people would be sympathetic friendly_iconoclast Jul 2019 #8