Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
some info about the heritage fdn [View all]
I located this looking for funding information for americans for prosperity:
you can find this in google: (but lately I see where they can edit some info=loose it)
MOLLY BALLSEP 25 2013, 7:00 AM ET
President Reagan and Heritage founder Ed Feulner (right) at the Heritage Foundation's 10th anniversary gala in 1983. (Heritage Foundation)
During the 1980 election, an up-and-coming Washington think tank called the Heritage Foundation undertook a massive task: to examine the federal government from top to bottom and produce a detailed, practical conservative policy vision.
The result, called Mandate for Leadership, epitomized the intellectual ambition of the then-rising conservative movement. Its 20 volumes, totaling more than 3,000 pages, included such proposals as income-tax cuts, inner-city enterprise zones, a presidential line-item veto, and a new Air Force bomber.
Despite the publication's academic prose and mind-boggling level of detail, it caused a sensation. A condensed version -- still more than 1,000 pages -- became a paperback bestseller in Washington. The newly elected Ronald Reagan passed out copies at his first Cabinet meeting, and it quickly became his administrations blueprint. By the end of Reagans first year in office, 60 percent of the Mandates 2,000 ideas were being implemented, and the Republican Partys status as a hotbed of intellectual energy was ratified. It was a Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who would declare in 1981, Of a sudden, the GOP has become a party of ideas.
The story of the conservative movement that has come to dominate the Republican Party over the last four decades is inextricably intertwined with the story of the Heritage Foundation. In that time, it became more than just another think tank. It came to occupy a place of special privilegea quasi-official arm of GOP administrations and Congresses; a sponsor of scholarship and supplier of legislation; a policy base for the party when out of power. Heritage has shaped American public policy in major ways, from Reagans missile-defense initiative to Clintons welfare reform: Both originated as Heritage proposals. So, too, did the idea of a universal health-care system based on a mandate that individuals buy insurance. Though Heritage subsequently abandoned it, the individual mandate famously became the basis of health-care reforms proposed by Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama.
"They're destroying the reputation and credibility of the Heritage Foundation. The respect for their policy work has been greatly diminished."
These days, Heritage has a different crusade. The foundations president, the confrontational former Senator Jim DeMint, spent the last month touring the country, drawing cheering crowds as he demanded that Republican politicians insist that Obamacare be defundedand denouncing those who wouldnt go along. Republicans are afraid, DeMint told NPR. And if they are, they need to be replaced. The foundations three-year-old activism arm, Heritage Action, spent half a million dollars on online ads targeting 100 Republican House members who didnt sign on to the defund crusade (Tell Representative Tom Cole to Stop Funding Obamacare).
The push from Heritage helped the defund scheme gather momentum, forcing Republican leaders to pull their proposed funding bill and replace it with one the Senate has committed to block. The resulting confrontation may force a government shutdown. Republicans who once worked out legislative language with the help of Heritage's distinguished Ph.D.s felt whiplash seeing the group cheerlead for collapse. Heritage was supposed to be above politics, they grumbled. Heritage was supposed to be about serious ideas, not tactical fights. White papers, not political campaignsand certainly not campaigns against Republicans.
Mickey Edwards, one of three founding trustees of the Heritage Foundation when it began in 1973, was one of those disturbed by Heritage's turn, which, he told me, makes it look like just another hack Tea Party kind of group.
A former eight-term Republican congressman from Oklahoma, Edwards now serves as vice president of the Aspen Institute. Theyre destroying the reputation and credibility of the Heritage Foundation," he added. "I think the respect for their [policy] work has been greatly diminished as a result.
The defund push is only the latest in a series of recent political battles Heritage has undertakencrusades against Republican politicians that have led to a rash of complaints. Representative Renee Ellmers called them bullies. Representative Lynn Westmoreland said the think tank had lost credibility with the people that were most supportive of them. Senator Tom Coburn accused Heritage Action of destroying the Republican Party.
Behind the scenes, GOP staffers complained that the organization they once looked to for intellectual ammunition had become a thorn in their side. Brian Walshs first Washington internship was with Heritage in 1996. He rose in Republican politics to serve as communications director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. In a scathing op-ed for U.S. News headlined Conservatives Eat Their Own for Profit, Walsh accused Heritage of taking extreme stands to generate fundraising dollars. In our great democracy, you affect public policy by offering a vision, influencing a majority of public opinion and winning elections, not by burning down the House, attacking your allies, and falling on your sword, he wrote.
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies