...that effectively constitute social engineering. But I also question, if that social engineering is not a worthy cause. I wonder if outside funding could not be found to eliminate the funding gap, but I think parents ought to have the choice. I think this is just further demonstration that Hawaiians need the federally protected status that something like the Akaka Bill would convey. I agree the whole system is in crisis, but if I was going to point fingers it would have to be at the electorate for producing a public education system that as is commonly said is just ahead of Mississippi and right behind Alabama.
I would actually be curious to see a comparison of the scores in English of 12th graders of the immersion schools vs. the public schools. I would hazard that the immersion students might actually perform better than their non-immersed peers. I would need to read the bill, but I think this probably isn't more than a very small step. I also wonder how the heck it would cost that much to simply have better translations of the test and evaluation. I mean, what the heck do they do on Niihau? 
I think there is a compelling state interest in these schools, but need more information to make an informed judgment on this question. I also wonder why they are not receiving instruction in English too for the course of their education. Although, I should probably disclose that I am not in principle opposed to charter schools, I've personally seen the failings of the public education system in this country and do agree with the notion that the biggest problem is a lack of sense of stakeholders in the school.
Maybe Inouye can get an earmark. 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read