Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rsdsharp

(10,549 posts)
2. The way I studied for my Con Law Ii final was to memorize the headings of the table of contents of the case book.
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:59 PM
Jul 2024

I already knew the cases, and where they fit into the headings. That allowed me to be able to quickly create an outline, complete with all of the cases, at the start of the test.

That was 39 years ago. At that time, learning the cases was a worthwhile exercise. They were the actual law, and with minor changes, were likely to remain so for generations — if not in perpetuity.

It seems like so much wasted effort, now. Stare decisis is dead; the law is now just what the ideology of 5 members of the Supreme Court dictates.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Colorado»Professors at Colorado's ...»Reply #2