Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Colorado

hlthe2b

(108,344 posts)

1. I hope the emphasis is on how aberrant these decisions are and how absolutely out-of-step with the historical

Reply to Nittersing (Original post)

Fri Jul 19, 2024, 01:36 PM

Jul 2024

precedence--followed by discussions of both ramifications and how the court may well be reformulated to allow future cases to be brought for reconsideration of some of these issues. Also a discussion of how Congress may counter with new statutory or even constitutional changes.

I do not think any law curriculum should present this as "FINAL AND ESTABLISHED" law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Professors at Colorado's law schools rethink curriculum amid "revolutionary" Supreme Court decisions [View all] Nittersing Jul 2024 OP

I hope the emphasis is on how aberrant these decisions are and how absolutely out-of-step with the historical hlthe2b Jul 2024 #1

The way I studied for my Con Law Ii final was to memorize the headings of the table of contents of the case book. rsdsharp Jul 2024 #2