Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Showing Original Post only (View all)Commentary: California should create more water -- much more [View all]
https://calmatters.org/commentary/2021/10/california-should-create-more-water-much-more/California currently manufactures far less drought-resilient freshwater than other similarly arid regions. Australia desalinates 10 times as much water as California despite having roughly half the population. Half of Israels water comes from desalinated ocean water compared with less than 1% in California. Israel also recycles 90% of its wastewater; California recycles just 10%.
Instead, California is almost entirely dependent on old-fashioned rain and snow. This strategy served us well for most of the 20th century but is today collapsing under Californias warming temperatures.
Last winter California received a decent amount of snow, but record high spring temperatures vaporized most of it. Today, 88% of California is experiencing severe drought or worse, up from just 3% this time last year. Never before has California lost so much water so quickly.
Without a strategy to create new water, California is doomed to run in place fighting over our existing, dwindling supplies. In fact, its already happening.
SNIP
Conservation can help, but it cannot save us. Thanks to huge strides in water efficiency, Californias urban water use has fallen to 1993 levels despite adding 9 million residents and doubling our economy. Most of the easy fat has already been cut.
The only way to avoid disaster is to begin transitioning California cities toward greater reliance on recycling and desalination, which would also bolster upstream supplies for river ecosystems and other public benefits, and provide greater reliability for farmers.
Thats why the state and federal governments should commit to creating 1.75 million acre feet about 25% of Californias current urban water use of new water from desalination and wastewater recycling by the end of this decade. If built today, this drought-proof buffer would cost about $18 billion and require about $3.4 billion in annual operational subsidies to regional water agencies, according to several cost estimates analyzed by the Bay Area Council.
Drought-proofing Californias economy for less than 1% of GDP is a bargain relative to running out of water and will create tens of thousands of new, good paying jobs along the way.
---------------
Full commentary at the link.
Why this isn't a California priority is baffling.
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agreed, and I have written to the governor and my legislators about this. Building water pipe
JohnSJ
Oct 2021
#1
The result is very concentrated salt water. It is typically dumped back into the ocean.
PoliticAverse
Oct 2021
#10
You can't be better placed than have your whole state running along the ocean.
PoliticAverse
Oct 2021
#3
As I understand it, one of the biggest challenges to desalination is energy usage
Clash City Rocker
Oct 2021
#6
I got curious about this awhile back and looked at desalinification plant pics. Those would be
brewens
Oct 2021
#7
California agriculture has benefited greatly from very low cost water. n/t
PoliticAverse
Oct 2021
#15
Well it's certainly something California should be thinking about and planning for
IcyPeas
Oct 2021
#17