Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Arizona

PandoraAwakened

(905 posts)

7. Least time-consuming method to determine 'yes'/'no' on judges

Reply to saidsimplesimon (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2018, 01:25 PM

Oct 2018

I know you've already voted, saidsimplesimon, but see my article "How to Vote for So-called 'Nonpartisan' Judges on Your 2018 Election Ballot" for a simple way to achieve this next time around:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211306547

If you have friends/family who have not yet voted, print out the Arizona judges list at the end of the article to help them wrap up that portion of their ballots pretty quickly.

K&R also greatly appreciated. Keep up the good fight!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Took me all morning to complete my ballot. [View all] saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 OP

how did you vote on 127? Mosby Oct 2018 #1

I have reservations on 127. saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 #3

I voted Yes on 127 too. nt DesertRat Oct 2018 #8

I voted for it grantcart Oct 2018 #5

Don't overlook the judges PandoraAwakened Oct 2018 #6

For judges, I look for endorsements from places like QLaw or Planned Parenthood LisaM Oct 2018 #2

Thanks, I will add QLaw for next time. saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 #4

Least time-consuming method to determine 'yes'/'no' on judges PandoraAwakened Oct 2018 #7