Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Arizona

LisaM

(29,461 posts)

2. For judges, I look for endorsements from places like QLaw or Planned Parenthood

Reply to saidsimplesimon (Original post)

Mon Oct 15, 2018, 02:03 PM

Oct 2018

Those are the people who really are affected by judicial decisions, and the they tend to pay attention.

Don't get me started on ballot proposals, the ones in Washington are all written in a very misleading manner.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Took me all morning to complete my ballot. [View all] saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 OP

how did you vote on 127? Mosby Oct 2018 #1

I have reservations on 127. saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 #3

I voted Yes on 127 too. nt DesertRat Oct 2018 #8

I voted for it grantcart Oct 2018 #5

Don't overlook the judges PandoraAwakened Oct 2018 #6

For judges, I look for endorsements from places like QLaw or Planned Parenthood LisaM Oct 2018 #2

Thanks, I will add QLaw for next time. saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 #4

Least time-consuming method to determine 'yes'/'no' on judges PandoraAwakened Oct 2018 #7