Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(39,260 posts)
4. Can you explain what you mean by "inadmissible"? Do you mean for collecting, or in court as evidence?
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 12:56 PM
Tuesday

Pretty sure that jurisdictions are usually where their headquarters are regardless of server locations.

From what I've gathered, law enforcement can still get warrants. Keyword search warrants, geofence warrants, and administrative subpoenas are all perfectly legal methods of collecting your information. That information could be anything from your location to your social media activity.

Pretty sure that corporate owned social media like Meta and Xitter can refuse data collection without a warrant, right? Meta says it doesn't sell its users' data. Last week, though, when I requested that Meta prep 10 years of my data logs, I'm still waiting. It says "still in process." However they did sent 8 files from 10 years of my platform photos, active sessions, chat history, IP addresses, facial recognition data and ads. So I downloaded those to an external.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»EFF (Electronic Frontier ...»Reply #4