Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Nuclear watchdog agency says Iran not cooperating [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)39. A past President stated this. Also, read Hersh's, The Samson Option
Wiki:
The Samson Option: Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy is a 1991 book by Seymour Hersh. It details the history of Israel's nuclear weapons program and its effects on Israel-American relations. The "Samson Option" of the book's title refers to the nuclear strategy whereby Israel would launch a massive nuclear retaliatory strike if the state itself was being overrun, just as the Biblical figure Samson is said to have pushed apart the pillars of a Philistine temple, bringing down the roof and killing himself and thousands of Philistines who had gathered to see him humiliated.
According to The New York Times, Hersh relied on Ari Ben-Menashe, a former Israeli government employee who says he worked for Israeli intelligence, for much of his information on the state of the Israeli nuclear program. However, Hersh confirmed all of this information with at least one other source.[1]
According to The New York Times, Hersh relied on Ari Ben-Menashe, a former Israeli government employee who says he worked for Israeli intelligence, for much of his information on the state of the Israeli nuclear program. However, Hersh confirmed all of this information with at least one other source.[1]
President Nixon and Henry Kissinger both stated that Israel used its nuclear weapons to blackmailed the US, as actually occurred during the '73 War when the overrun scenario referenced above was a possibility, forcing the US to supply weapons to Israel in its war with Egypt and Syria. See, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/29/world/middleeast/29nixon.html?_r=0
Israels Nuclear Arsenal Vexed Nixon
By DAVID STOUT
Published: November 29, 2007
WASHINGTON, Nov. 28 In July 1969, as the world was spellbound by the Apollo 11 mission to the moon, President Richard M. Nixon and his close advisers were quietly fretting about a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Their main worry was not a potential enemy of the United States, but one of Americas closest friends.
Tensions over Israels nuclear weapons cast a shadow over talks between Richard M. Nixon and Golda Meir in 1969.
Related
Mandatory Review Documents (nixon.archives.gov)
Memo From Kissinger to Nixon on the Israeli Nuclear Program (July 19, 1969)
The Israelis, who are one of the few peoples whose survival is genuinely threatened, are probably more likely than almost any other country to actually use their nuclear weapons, Henry A. Kissinger, the national security adviser, warned Mr. Nixon in a memorandum dated July 19, 1969 part of a newly released trove of documents.
Israels nuclear arms program, which Israel has never officially conceded exists, was believed to have begun at least several years before, but it was causing special problems for the young Nixon administration.
By DAVID STOUT
Published: November 29, 2007
WASHINGTON, Nov. 28 In July 1969, as the world was spellbound by the Apollo 11 mission to the moon, President Richard M. Nixon and his close advisers were quietly fretting about a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Their main worry was not a potential enemy of the United States, but one of Americas closest friends.
Tensions over Israels nuclear weapons cast a shadow over talks between Richard M. Nixon and Golda Meir in 1969.
Related
Mandatory Review Documents (nixon.archives.gov)
Memo From Kissinger to Nixon on the Israeli Nuclear Program (July 19, 1969)
The Israelis, who are one of the few peoples whose survival is genuinely threatened, are probably more likely than almost any other country to actually use their nuclear weapons, Henry A. Kissinger, the national security adviser, warned Mr. Nixon in a memorandum dated July 19, 1969 part of a newly released trove of documents.
Israels nuclear arms program, which Israel has never officially conceded exists, was believed to have begun at least several years before, but it was causing special problems for the young Nixon administration.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They can use that red herring all they want, doesn't relieve them of their duties.
Behind the Aegis
Mar 2013
#8
When the US applies sanctions on Israel to end its nuclear program, this will be the right thing
leveymg
Mar 2013
#14
Israel's nuclear bombs are outside the NPT, and the initial batch were made of plutonium stolen from
leveymg
Mar 2013
#20
I'm surprised you didn't know about the Israeli theft of plutonium from a US Navy nuclear plant,
leveymg
Mar 2013
#22
And pretty obviously untrue. If it is US plutonium, I am sure we gave it to them.
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#24
If you prefer the term, diversion of U.S. nuclear materials to Israel, that's still illegal under
leveymg
Mar 2013
#26
The US is in violation of the NPT for diversion; Israel in violation of US law for receipt
leveymg
Mar 2013
#28
You just asserted it was a theft. Now because it suits your purposes, you are saying it was transfer
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#29
If the transfer was authorized, it was diversion. If unauthorized, theft. Take your pick.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#32
Again, that analogy doesnt work. Israel never signed the NPT. If you want to assert hypocrisy your
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#34
No, not up in arms. I don't expect that Israel will be prosecuted, but I don't think sanctions on
leveymg
Mar 2013
#35
Here's more from that '07 NYT article about Israel's nuclear blackmail of the US
leveymg
Mar 2013
#41
None of that makes Kissinger's statements about the diversion untrue, nor does it change the fact
leveymg
Mar 2013
#43
No, Israel cannot be in violation of a treaty it never signed and to which it is not a party. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#30
Steven, read more carefully. I said if not a theft, the transfer would be an NPT violation
leveymg
Mar 2013
#37
Well, if Iraq had actually possessed WMDs... I wouldn't have been against the war...
Comrade_McKenzie
Mar 2013
#12