Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Nuclear watchdog agency says Iran not cooperating [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)28. The US is in violation of the NPT for diversion; Israel in violation of US law for receipt
and coordination of unlawful transfer of technology and militarily significant materials without lawful authorization, as are its nationals and U.S. agents involved in the scheme. The matter was extensively investigated by the FBI, the Naval Investigative Service, and other federal agencies. The decision to not prosecute was an exercise of discretion based in political considerations.
US Violation of NPT Non-proliferation (http://www.scujil.org/volumes/v2/3)
Article I of the NPT states:
Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.[53]
Article II covers the duties of non-nuclear nations:
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.[54]
Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.[53]
Article II covers the duties of non-nuclear nations:
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.[54]
Attendant violations of US law (Espionage Act of 1917, Theft, Unlawful Conversion of U.S. Gov't property)
In 1988, Samuel Morison, an employee of the US Dept. of the Navy, unsuccessfully filed cert to remain free on bond after he was convicted of stealing classified U.S. satellite photos of a Soviet aircraft carrier under construction and selling the photos to Jane's Defense Weekly for $300. The magazine and its editors were not prosecuted. Morison was convicted of two charges, one related to conversion of gov't property and the second under Sec. 793 of the Espionage Act. See, http://supreme.justia.com/us/486/1306/case.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They can use that red herring all they want, doesn't relieve them of their duties.
Behind the Aegis
Mar 2013
#8
When the US applies sanctions on Israel to end its nuclear program, this will be the right thing
leveymg
Mar 2013
#14
Israel's nuclear bombs are outside the NPT, and the initial batch were made of plutonium stolen from
leveymg
Mar 2013
#20
I'm surprised you didn't know about the Israeli theft of plutonium from a US Navy nuclear plant,
leveymg
Mar 2013
#22
And pretty obviously untrue. If it is US plutonium, I am sure we gave it to them.
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#24
If you prefer the term, diversion of U.S. nuclear materials to Israel, that's still illegal under
leveymg
Mar 2013
#26
The US is in violation of the NPT for diversion; Israel in violation of US law for receipt
leveymg
Mar 2013
#28
You just asserted it was a theft. Now because it suits your purposes, you are saying it was transfer
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#29
If the transfer was authorized, it was diversion. If unauthorized, theft. Take your pick.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#32
Again, that analogy doesnt work. Israel never signed the NPT. If you want to assert hypocrisy your
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#34
No, not up in arms. I don't expect that Israel will be prosecuted, but I don't think sanctions on
leveymg
Mar 2013
#35
Here's more from that '07 NYT article about Israel's nuclear blackmail of the US
leveymg
Mar 2013
#41
None of that makes Kissinger's statements about the diversion untrue, nor does it change the fact
leveymg
Mar 2013
#43
No, Israel cannot be in violation of a treaty it never signed and to which it is not a party. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#30
Steven, read more carefully. I said if not a theft, the transfer would be an NPT violation
leveymg
Mar 2013
#37
Well, if Iraq had actually possessed WMDs... I wouldn't have been against the war...
Comrade_McKenzie
Mar 2013
#12