He should have sued them for $5.00 - that's right FIVE DOLLARS - and he probably would have won the lawsuit. But of course they're going to fight this stupid thing for $5 billion. Anyone would fight this, and I'm sure the BBC lawyers will win the case.
But that's not the point, Chump is just looking for REVENGE and HEADLINES, in that order. He already has the revenge and the headlines because now BBC has to pay lawyers to defend them in court.
It's absurd the way Chump gets away with this - using the court systems in the US and Britain - and it costs him practically nothing. Chump already has a hundred lawyers on his (personal) payroll, plus the legal staffers who work for him in the White House also get pulled into these things, even though they aren't supposed to.
If he wanted an apology and nothing else, Chump could have sued BBC for $5.00 and an apology, and they would have done it. The court doesn't admonish someone who wins their case, no matter how useless the lawsuit is.
: 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read