Latest Breaking News

SunSeeker

(57,393 posts)

46. No I didn't. As I said, the prior ruling, with 3 dissents, involved the exact same Executive Order.

Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:23 PM

Monday

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5373118-supreme-court-liberal-dissent-birthright/

How about YOU explain what you found so "interesting" about "No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler Friday OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Friday #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Friday #2

You're exactly right. PSPS Friday #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde Friday #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 Friday #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Friday #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Friday #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Friday #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Friday #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja Friday #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Friday #9

I didn't mean now iemanja Friday #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler Friday #17

You're probably right. iemanja Friday #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy Friday #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking Friday #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler Friday #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote Friday #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker Friday #29

You are mistaken. onenote Friday #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker Saturday #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote Saturday #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker Saturday #36

Wow. Just wow. onenote Saturday #38

You started this be saying no dissents were noted. What was your point other than to suggest they flipped? SunSeeker Sunday #39

My point was to make clear no one had noted a dissent. Nothing more or less. onenote Sunday #40

So you just made a pointless post. Got it. nt SunSeeker Sunday #41

And you stand by your lie about when cert was granted. Got it. nt onenote Sunday #43

I didn't lie about when cert was granted. I'm not the one telling lies here. nt SunSeeker Monday #44

Yeah you did. onenote Monday #45

No I didn't. As I said, the prior ruling, with 3 dissents, involved the exact same Executive Order. SunSeeker Monday #46

You said certiorari had been granted. It hadn't and you have to know that by now. Not even the same case. onenote Yesterday #47

The cases are all about the same birthright citizenship EO. It's all a bullshit game by the SCOTUS conservatives. SunSeeker Yesterday #48

john brown's body struggle4progress Friday #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress Friday #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress Friday #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress Friday #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick Friday #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF Friday #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree Friday #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker Friday #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins Friday #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 Friday #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack Friday #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer Saturday #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE Friday #31

Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird Saturday #37

These people are partisan political operatives... RetiredParatrooper Sunday #42