Latest Breaking News

Blasphemer

(3,559 posts)

34. Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation.

Sat Dec 6, 2025, 12:54 AM

Yesterday

The # of SCOTUS justices has been changed 7 times. The last change (to 9) was in 1869. The GOP knows that Dems are very likely to do this in 2028 when they have the White House and Congress back. If the Roberts Court was smart, it would try to keep that from happening by being a little bit more sane. They won't.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SunSeeker Shipwack

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler Friday OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Friday #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Friday #2

You're exactly right. PSPS Friday #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde Friday #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 Friday #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Friday #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Friday #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Friday #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Friday #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja Friday #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Friday #9

I didn't mean now iemanja Friday #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler Friday #17

You're probably right. iemanja Friday #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy Friday #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking Friday #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler Friday #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote Friday #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker Friday #29

You are mistaken. onenote Friday #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker Yesterday #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote Yesterday #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker Yesterday #36

Wow. Just wow. onenote Yesterday #38

You started this be saying no dissents were noted. What was your point other than to suggest they flipped? SunSeeker 3 hrs ago #39

My point was to make clear no one had noted a dissent. Nothing more or less. onenote 2 hrs ago #40

So you just made a pointless post. Got it. nt SunSeeker 2 hrs ago #41

And you stand by your lie about when cert was granted. Got it. nt onenote 2 hrs ago #43

john brown's body struggle4progress Friday #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress Friday #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress Friday #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress Friday #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick Friday #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF Friday #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree Friday #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker Friday #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins Friday #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 Friday #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack Friday #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer Yesterday #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE Friday #31

Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird Yesterday #37

These people are partisan political operatives... RetiredParatrooper 2 hrs ago #42