Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

iemanja

(57,247 posts)

21. You're probably right.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #17)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 06:18 PM

Friday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler Friday OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Friday #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Friday #2

You're exactly right. PSPS Friday #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde Friday #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 Friday #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Friday #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Friday #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Friday #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Friday #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja Friday #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Friday #9

I didn't mean now iemanja Friday #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler Friday #17

You're probably right. iemanja Friday #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy Friday #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking Friday #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler Friday #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote Friday #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker Friday #29

You are mistaken. onenote Friday #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker Yesterday #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote Yesterday #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker Yesterday #36

Wow. Just wow. onenote Yesterday #38

You started this be saying no dissents were noted. What was your point other than to suggest they flipped? SunSeeker 23 min ago #39

john brown's body struggle4progress Friday #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress Friday #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress Friday #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress Friday #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick Friday #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF Friday #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree Friday #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker Friday #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins Friday #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 Friday #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack Friday #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer Yesterday #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE Friday #31

Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird Yesterday #37