Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

muriel_volestrangler

(105,366 posts)

9. Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt)

Reply to iemanja (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 03:48 PM

Yesterday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Shipwack joshdawg

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler Yesterday OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Yesterday #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Yesterday #2

You're exactly right. PSPS Yesterday #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde 23 hrs ago #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 21 hrs ago #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Yesterday #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Yesterday #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Yesterday #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Yesterday #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja Yesterday #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #9

I didn't mean now iemanja 22 hrs ago #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #17

You're probably right. iemanja 22 hrs ago #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking Yesterday #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote 22 hrs ago #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker 19 hrs ago #29

You are mistaken. onenote 16 hrs ago #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote 15 hrs ago #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #36

Wow. Just wow. onenote 4 hrs ago #38

john brown's body struggle4progress 22 hrs ago #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress 22 hrs ago #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress 22 hrs ago #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress 22 hrs ago #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick 21 hrs ago #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF 21 hrs ago #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree 21 hrs ago #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker 20 hrs ago #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins 20 hrs ago #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 20 hrs ago #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack 18 hrs ago #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer 15 hrs ago #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE 17 hrs ago #31

Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird 5 hrs ago #37