Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(55,281 posts)
11. Of course their work is dictated if it must be "mutually agreed" by the Trump administration.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:09 PM
Sunday
The firm faced intense criticism from some lawyers in part for pledging the equivalent of $40 million in pro bono legal services to support "mutually agreed" administration projects such as combating antisemitism and supporting veterans.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The law firm showed they are weak cowards. Trump will keep demanding more and more. Irish_Dem Sunday #1
They are lawyers for fuck sake. Do what good lawyers do and... S/V Loner Sunday #2
Makes me wonder now BumRushDaShow Sunday #4
Makes sense to me. S/V Loner Sunday #5
"The executive order could easily have destroyed our firm," Karp said SunSeeker Sunday #7
" all while their security clearances and federal contracts were yanked" BumRushDaShow Monday #21
Perkins Coie got a stay, but still lost clients. SunSeeker Monday #22
Perkins Coie has about 1/2 the revenue of Paul Weiss BumRushDaShow Monday #23
Yes, and that money can disappear overnight if their clients go elsewhere. SunSeeker Monday #24
"Yes, and that money can disappear overnight if their clients go elsewhere." BumRushDaShow Monday #25
Big business clients, like the law firms, only care about money. They aren't like Target customers. SunSeeker Monday #27
"They aren't like Target customers." BumRushDaShow Monday #28
They're unlikely to find a court that will block moves related to security clearances FBaggins Monday #29
That will depend on what justification is provided for blocking such BumRushDaShow Monday #30
This has been Trump's MO all his life. Now he's backed by the money of the United States treasury Walleye Monday #26
We shall see............... Lovie777 Sunday #3
Bull shit ! republianmushroom Sunday #6
If the Trump administration has to "approve" the work, that IS dictating the work. SunSeeker Sunday #8
Sure, Jan... n/t Drum Sunday #9
Of course their work is dictated if it must be "mutually agreed" by the Trump administration. SunSeeker Sunday #11
Yeah. tRump won't be 'dictating'. Mc Mike Sunday #10
"It's not a principle until it costs you money." C_U_L8R Sunday #12
The executive order could easily have destroyed our firm. Demobrat Sunday #13
Do something to benefit the country! BidenRocks Sunday #14
Yet. rsdsharp Sunday #15
Karp had no choice. Other firms, like vultures, were already trying to steal their clients. SunSeeker Monday #16
certain other firms were seeking to exploit our vulnerabilities by aggressively soliciting our clients Demobrat Monday #17
Well, they're hoping they don't end up like Perkins Coie, who fought their EO. SunSeeker Monday #19
Whatever, Quisling. AmericaUnderSiege Monday #18
Nobody protected Perkins Coie, why would anyone protect Paul Weiss? SunSeeker Monday #20
Brad Karp is a fucking liar. Ray Bruns Monday #31
Yes, Brad, he is dictating legal work and you are caving. travelingthrulife Monday #32
I am disappointed in Paul Weiss LetMyPeopleVote Monday #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump is not 'dictating' ...»Reply #11