Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Republican Mayor Endorses Kamala Harris With Ominous Warning: 'I Will Hold Fast to What Is Good' [View all]BumRushDaShow
(142,658 posts)8. I think it was pretty much implied with the Opinion Headline
A Republican Mayors Unexpected Presidential Vote
But also in what was written. The "expected" would be to support MAGA world's leader.
https://thephiladelphiacitizen.org/guest-commentary-a-republican-mayors-unexpected-presidential-vote/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=guest-commentary-a-republican-mayors-unexpected-presidential-vote
Doing a word search on Harris will completely miss the intent however.
The piece is done like a sermon where each paragraph begins with -
I took for granted that both leading candidates
He starts out claiming that during his voting life, he pretty much assumed "both sides" were the same (in a nutshell) and "took that for granted". But then almost every paragraph distinguishes the huge differences between the two this go-around.
For example -
I took for granted that both leading candidates would have no tolerance for political violence, extremism, conspiracy theories, racism, misogyny and bigotry. I took for granted that both leading candidates would not only keep their distance from such ideas and those who espoused them, but would actively denounce them if needed.
I took for granted that both leading candidates held a firm commitment to the U.S. Constitution. I could not have imagined a world where any leading candidate would have ever publicly called for the Constitutions termination.
I took for granted that both leading candidates respected our military, would fulfill their role in our national defense and their obligation to guard confidential information they might have access to. I took for granted that both leading candidates valued our veterans and held most sacred our obligation to those who were captured or killed.
He didn't have to "name names".
(ETA - I looked him up and apparently he is a never-45er and a youngin' to boot - 45 years old and one of the rare "moderate" GOPers)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republican Mayor Endorses Kamala Harris With Ominous Warning: 'I Will Hold Fast to What Is Good' [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Oct 26
OP
The growing number of those living in poverty proves that most of the rich and powerful are not decent human beings.
cstanleytech
Oct 26
#17
Maybe I missed it but, where in the letter does he say he endorses Kamala Harris?
Escurumbele
Oct 26
#7
I understand that, but it still lacks a solid statement statating his endorsement for Kamala Harris.
Escurumbele
Oct 26
#18
One of Holt's proudest accomplishments was bringing Edmond's Shakespeare in the Park to the downtown stage.
Simeon Salus
Oct 26
#12
As a senior at OU I was required to write an essay in William Savage's Oklahoma History
Simeon Salus
Oct 26
#23