Latest Breaking News

littlemissmartypants

(25,483 posts)

11. Thats NOT what it means and please stop spreading bad information. TY!

Reply to Warpy (Reply #6)

Thu Sep 26, 2024, 09:52 PM

Sep 26

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

North Carolina removes 747,000 from voter rolls, citing ineligibility [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 26 OP

This is how you steal elections and kill democracy. One Party Rule, Baby! OAITW r.2.0 Sep 26 #1

this is fairly standard stuff stopdiggin Sep 26 #2

It certainly is! And I'm sick to death of people on here littlemissmartypants Sep 26 #10

we have sold ourselves the 'election fiddling' scenario so well stopdiggin Sep 26 #13

Imo, it's just more DU clickbait. littlemissmartypants Sep 26 #16

I'm in Texas and same thing. LeftInTX Sep 26 #17

Dead people yes but removing people because they haven't voted in the last two Fed elections? Bengus81 Sep 29 #26

The elections boards send out update cards to every registered voter. littlemissmartypants Sep 29 #27

See this BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #30

Are you sure you wanted to post this here? I think I shared this with you the other day. littlemissmartypants Sep 29 #31

There is a lot of discussion in this thread denigrating people who are questioning purges BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #32

I'm very aware. I just wish others were, too. Oh, well. littlemissmartypants Sep 29 #33

yes - but the 'purge' under discussion (as per OP) stopdiggin Sep 29 #38

"if the is attempting to sneak in some shady stuff (in addition) - then by all means give em' hell on those measures." BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #39

then it would appear that those efforts would fail stopdiggin Sep 29 #41

"then it would appear that those efforts would fail" BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #42

It's Not As Sinister As It Sounds. GB_RN Sep 27 #21

Thank you. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Sep 29 #28

Will those voters who moved, or who are inactive, be able to vote provisionally? Oopsie Daisy Sep 29 #29

that is generally the case stopdiggin Sep 29 #36

Yes, that's what I assumed would be the case. --- They can vote provisionally and their ballot * Oopsie Daisy Sep 29 #37

But I want people to panic Jk23 Sep 29 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 26 #3

But maybe this is a typical number VMA131Marine Sep 26 #9

There is always partisan bias when republicans do these things. oldmanlynn Sep 27 #19

How about when it's in the hands of Democrats? Igel Sep 28 #22

The concern might be with a CURRENT RNC case against NC registrants BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #34

That sounds unreasonable in the extreme. Joinfortmill Sep 26 #4

Hopefully Anderson Clayton's team has registered lots of 18 year olds. Nt Fiendish Thingy Sep 26 #5

What makes this remarkable is the sheer number Warpy Sep 26 #6

Thats NOT what it means and please stop spreading bad information. TY! littlemissmartypants Sep 26 #11

It didn't just happen "close to the election" -- its the number removed over the past 20 months. onenote Sep 26 #14

How to find out if you're registered to vote in NC FakeNoose Sep 26 #7

That depends on the state. Igel Sep 28 #23

Yes but this article is about North Carolina FakeNoose Sep 28 #25

"There was a CT for a while that provisional ballots were always tossed." BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #35

That is Delphinus Sep 26 #8

Yes. The voters. If you keep your registration current at the BOE littlemissmartypants Sep 26 #12

747,000 over 20 months. My math skills aren't great but I think that's around 37,350/month or less than 1/2 of 1 percent onenote Sep 26 #15

Why are they allowed to do this RIGHT before an election? forgotmylogin Sep 26 #18

What's "this"? Make the announcement about the previous 20 months? Igel Sep 28 #24

It is pretty common sense, if you move to a new address, or you hadn't voted in an election for a couple of years, you JohnSJ Sep 27 #20

This is why I never stop voting. milestogo Sep 29 #43