Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(28,143 posts)

9. No, not their actual use rather their continued threat to use them.

Tue Sep 27, 2022, 04:08 PM

Sep 2022

And the Russian ambassadors would be allowed to remain but with a reduced staff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Blinken: US has told Russia to 'stop the loose talk' on nuclear weapons [View all] Omaha Steve Sep 2022 OP

I think the US/NATO response would be prodigitalson Sep 2022 #1

On what basis? James48 Sep 2022 #3

The Act doesn't require congressional approval until 60 days of fighting prodigitalson Sep 2022 #4

How about if the radioactive cloud blanketed a NATO country? MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2022 #8

Reducing our embassy personal in Russia by half along with ejecting cstanleytech Sep 2022 #2

yeah that would teach them a lesson prodigitalson Sep 2022 #5

Maybe I misunderstood you but prodigitalson Sep 2022 #7

No, not their actual use rather their continued threat to use them. cstanleytech Sep 2022 #9

gotcha prodigitalson Sep 2022 #10

They didn't stop, though 867-5309. Sep 2022 #11