Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EndlessWire

(8,103 posts)
39. I think you can force
Fri Jun 18, 2021, 02:08 AM
Jun 2021

a public service agency to follow the rules of civil society. No one forced them to form an agency that discriminates against fellow citizens. They can have their own beliefs, they just can't exclude other people and decide their rights based on their own personal beliefs. If you don't want to do that, don't enter into those areas. This is no different than the segregated South.

I am appalled that it was a 9-0 decision. Systematic exclusion of those who are different, and this is just one more brick.

We should make churches pay their fair share.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow. Unanimous decision. Tomconroy Jun 2021 #1
That seems to be overlooked sarisataka Jun 2021 #13
I Believe It Is Correct RobinA Jun 2021 #15
I am ok with that as long as they don't receive public funding mdbl Jun 2021 #26
they do dsc Jun 2021 #31
Which should cease imo as they want to have freedom from the government to use their religion to cstanleytech Jun 2021 #35
So LGBTQ can start a religion and not allow twodogsbarking Jun 2021 #2
even better azureblue Jun 2021 #12
There are currently animal rights movements who want to end entire meat industry. OneCrazyDiamond Jun 2021 #25
You just gave HULU another idea for a series mdbl Jun 2021 #27
But that was the Old Testament. oldsoftie Jun 2021 #28
Jesus also helped the lepers and Alpeduez21 Jun 2021 #29
They pick the parts they like! oldsoftie Jun 2021 #30
Time to tax churches. Past time actually. walkingman Jun 2021 #3
Just churches, or all non-profits? Jose Garcia Jun 2021 #6
The term non-profit is just another word for tax dodger, in my opinion. walkingman Jun 2021 #23
non profits - spend the $$ on yourself, when none is left over, no profit nt msongs Jun 2021 #34
What a poorly written article. mnhtnbb Jun 2021 #4
I Believe RobinA Jun 2021 #16
These anti-gay decisions are alarming. Politicub Jun 2021 #5
+1000 BeyondGeography Jun 2021 #7
I agree Solly Mack Jun 2021 #9
+1 FreeState Jun 2021 #14
+1 /nt flibbitygiblets Jun 2021 #33
Religiosity RobinA Jun 2021 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Politicub Jun 2021 #20
It was 9-0 though Polybius Jun 2021 #22
Seems like they are saying the city cannot deny the Catholic agency solely on the same sex issue Buckeyeblue Jun 2021 #8
This decision Enshrines intolerance as Christian, and discrimination as law bucolic_frolic Jun 2021 #10
Private religious agency gets separation of church and state rights. ancianita Jun 2021 #11
Or A Non-Church RobinA Jun 2021 #18
The First Amendment prevents the government from regulating the establishment of religion. Lonestarblue Jun 2021 #19
In Nebraska the state has contracted out foster care to a Catholic organization. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2021 #21
using this ruling i can claim that anti abortion laws violate religious freedom rdking647 Jun 2021 #24
Maybe Philadelphia can refuse to contract with CSS due to preponderance of pedophiles Wild blueberry Jun 2021 #32
I'm sure that all those kids who age out of the foster system and get cast out to sink or swim, 2Gingersnaps Jun 2021 #36
Since it was 9-0, it had to be the right decision Polybius Jun 2021 #37
A 9-0 decision. I don't disagree with it. GulfCoast66 Jun 2021 #38
I think you can force EndlessWire Jun 2021 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Religious freedom vs. LGB...»Reply #39