Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Politically connected sex offender Jeffrey Epstein settles suit, averting victim testimony [View all]LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)16. Trump said of Epstein in 2002...
"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
(NYMag.com, August 12, 2018)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Politically connected sex offender Jeffrey Epstein settles suit, averting victim testimony [View all]
brooklynite
Dec 2018
OP
Not at all. He settled to avoid the public testimony & record. THAT was the consequence he avoided
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#8
Apparently you don't at all... You throw enough money at those who have none and they have no choice
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#11
You really don't have a clue or you at least seem to lack understanding at all.
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#15
To suggest they were only out for money and that is why they did not opt to speak up in the trial
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#24
Painting these women as anything but victims who finally had a chance to have their voice heard, but
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#26
No.. I believe they were convinced by their lawyers that this was the best choice.
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#32
I am NOT questioning their decision. I bemoan that they had little options and little to no justice
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#39
You defend the rich and powerful getting one system of justice while others get none.
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#43
They made the same choice that every plaintiff has to make when offered a settlement
onenote
Dec 2018
#29
Your condescension towards other DUers-- who know full well this was a civil case is beyond the pale
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#27
I never said they did not make a decision--only that they were left with few choices due to being
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#31
Again, you don't get it. They deserve the $$ but they also deserved their voices to be heard.
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#37
No, you are the one who is judging them. I bemoan they received no real justice. You defend a system
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#41
They also could have gotten some additional vindication, but they also could have risked not getting
onenote
Dec 2018
#48
I'm sure, if there are "dozens" of women involved, new charges from new complaintants can arise...
louis c
Dec 2018
#6
How is it so many don't get it? Yes, this was a civil case, but he paid it off to avoid the public
hlthe2b
Dec 2018
#10
The Original Settlement Was Illegal - Victims Were Not Informed - Can Be Thrown Out
PaulX2
Dec 2018
#36