Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,725 posts)
17. "once the White House opened up the grounds to reporters, the First Amendment applied."
Fri Nov 16, 2018, 11:48 AM
Nov 2018

I mentioned here (this thread) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142203979#post8 about something that had been bandied about before inauguration -

This also may touch on an early issue in this administration just before inauguration, where it had been suggested that the press briefings be held outside of the WH at another location. On one side, actually following through with that would have made the "excuse" to pull credentials, truly moot vs the current argument of having a right to "control access" to the WH mansion itself.


So it will be interesting to see if they move the press out of the WH altogether (and perhaps face another lawsuit and real inability to "control access" ) or what.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let there be a trial dalton99a Nov 2018 #1
It will be an interesting trial to say the least BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #8
Trump-appointed judge forces White House to reinstate press pass of CNN's Jim Acosta Gothmog Nov 2018 #2
Piss dotard off v. Have ruling overturned mobeau69 Nov 2018 #13
Womp womp in your face porkchop Fullduplexxx Nov 2018 #3
Score one for the First Amendment. Liberty Belle Nov 2018 #4
WH has no case AlexSFCA Nov 2018 #5
"Eat it, Dirty Donny*" - The Citizens of these United States... Achilleaze Nov 2018 #6
I called it! FakeNoose Nov 2018 #7
I'm sure the judge thought that if Trump never calls on Acosta again, the problem goes away, eh? n/m machoneman Nov 2018 #9
GO Jim GO bluestarone Nov 2018 #10
Jim Acosta's speaking, he's got one of those shit-eating grins on his face!! George II Nov 2018 #11
'Kelly said he agreed with the government's argument that there was no First Amendment right elleng Nov 2018 #12
Yup, either no one is allowed access or reasonable and fair allowances must be made for cstanleytech Nov 2018 #16
"once the White House opened up the grounds to reporters, the First Amendment applied." BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #17
Next move from Cheeto DUgosh Nov 2018 #14
LOL. mobeau69 Nov 2018 #19
I expect Jacob Wohl and "Surefire Intelligence" to attempt that.. Just a Weirdo Nov 2018 #21
Not bad, but there is no law that says the president has to have press conferences. Odoreida Nov 2018 #15
"but there really is no way to compel a president to have press conferences" BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #20
The Constitution doesn't compel press conferences onenote Nov 2018 #22
I basically indicated that BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #24
I can't imagine him not giving a speech that will be carried on all of the networks. onenote Nov 2018 #25
Trump could not live Turbineguy Nov 2018 #28
..... BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #30
But here is the kicker BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #29
CNN suit: this preliminary injunction is not a ruling on the merits, just an initial step. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2018 #18
Article: "once the White House opened up the grounds to reporters, the First Amendment applied." LastLiberal in PalmSprings Nov 2018 #23
Those "press conferences" are a joke. The WH is not required to have them, The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2018 #27
Trump played the trump card. Turbineguy Nov 2018 #26
CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta (Photo): Rhiannon12866 Nov 2018 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge hands CNN victory i...»Reply #17